AMZZ vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMZZ (GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZZ charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

AMZZ vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZZ achieves a -4.99% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.

AMZZ

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: -24.11%
• YTD: -4.99%
• 6M: -5.95%
• 1Y: 6.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LINT

• 1D: -12.86%
• 1M: 11.99%
• YTD: 744.89%
• 6M: 773.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZZ vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMZZ GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF	-4.99%	6.10%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	744.89%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZZ and LINT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.27

AMZZ vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMZZ	LINT
Consumer Cyclical	66.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AMZZ vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZZ

AMZZ Risk / Return Rank: 11
AMZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
AMZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
AMZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 13
AMZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
AMZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 10

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZZ vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZZ	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.11	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.35	—	—

Drawdowns

AMZZ vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZZ drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZZ and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZZ	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.28%	-49.54%	-5.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.83%	-12.86%	-15.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.25%	-20.48%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMZZ	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.33%	168.83%	-107.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.09%	168.83%	-105.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.09%	168.83%	-105.74%

AMZZ vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZZ has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZZ vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

AMZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.

Position	TTM	2025
AMZZ GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.10%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZZ and LINT in my portfolio?

AMZZ and LINT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMZZ or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZZ or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMZZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZZ or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for AMZZ.

What is the main difference between AMZZ and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AMZZ and 0.97% for LINT.