AMZY vs. WNTR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AMZY (YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZY returned 21.24% vs 106.92% for WNTR. Their -0.32 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. AMZY charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

AMZY vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZY achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 10.51% return.

AMZY

• 1D: 3.21%
• 1M: 14.34%
• 6M: 11.00%
• YTD: 14.08%
• 1Y: 21.24%
• 3Y*: 22.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.97%

WNTR

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 7.89%
• 6M: 8.31%
• YTD: 10.51%
• 1Y: 106.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 47.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMZY YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF	$3.63M	$2.96M	$4.73M
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	$3.92M	$3.66M	$3.95M

AMZY vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMZY YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF	14.08%	15.78%
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	10.51%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZY and WNTR is -0.30, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.32

Return for Risk

AMZY vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMZY

AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 32
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 35
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 28

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 69
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 71
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMZY vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZY	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	1.97	-1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	2.27	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.30	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	2.52	-1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.40	6.38	-3.98

AMZY vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZY Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZY and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMZY vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZY drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZY and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZY	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.70%	-42.65%	+18.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.61%	-42.65%	+23.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-9.84%	+9.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.57%	-20.15%	+14.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.87%	16.83%	-7.96%

Volatility

AMZY vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) has a higher volatility of 13.72% compared to YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) at 13.00%. This indicates that AMZY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZY	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.72%	13.00%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.48%	47.22%	-25.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.32%	54.66%	-27.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.13%	53.34%	-27.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.13%	53.34%	-27.21%

AMZY vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZY has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZY vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

AMZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.29%, less than WNTR's 107.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMZY YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF	45.29%	52.59%	47.91%	9.90%
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	107.26%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZY and WNTR in my portfolio?

AMZY and WNTR have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZY or WNTR?

AMZY has higher volatility (13.72%) compared to WNTR (13.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZY dropped -23.70% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, AMZY or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 106.92% vs 21.24% for AMZY. On fees, WNTR is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 13.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZY or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 106.92% return vs 21.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZY or WNTR?

WNTR is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZY or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.26%, compared with 45.29% for AMZY.

What is the main difference between AMZY and WNTR?

Their fees differ too: 1.09% for AMZY and 1.00% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.