AMZW vs. XOMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO).
AMZW and XOMO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMZW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jun 18, 2025. XOMO is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Aug 30, 2023.
Performance
AMZW vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMZW vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | -12.18% | 7.33% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 23.45% | 4.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a -12.18% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 23.45% return.
AMZW
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- -12.18%
- 6M
- -8.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOMO
- 1D
- -4.29%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 23.45%
- 6M
- 31.32%
- 1Y
- 22.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMZW vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AMZW vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank
AMZW
XOMO
AMZW vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZW | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | 0.55 | -0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZW and XOMO is -0.12. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
AMZW vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison
AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.14%, more than XOMO's 30.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 41.14% | 25.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 30.57% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% |
Drawdowns
AMZW vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and XOMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZW | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -18.90% | -7.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.39% | -5.12% | -17.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.67% | -7.05% | -2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.69% | — |
Volatility
AMZW vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMZW | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.49% | 22.02% | +15.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.49% | 18.46% | +19.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.49% | 18.46% | +19.03% |