AMZW vs. QDTE
AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZW returned 6.63% vs 31.05% for QDTE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.
Performance
AMZW vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 12.21% return.
AMZW
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -14.89%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- -1.71%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDTE
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 12.21%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 31.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZW vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | -0.73% | 7.33% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 12.21% | 19.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZW and QDTE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.61 |
The correlation between AMZW and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
AMZW vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZW
QDTE
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMZW
QDTE
-
Basic Materials
AMZW
-
QDTE
-
Communication Services
AMZW
-
QDTE
-
Consumer Defensive
AMZW
-
QDTE
-
Energy
AMZW
-
QDTE
-
Financial Services
AMZW
-
QDTE
Healthcare
AMZW
-
QDTE
-
Industrials
AMZW
-
QDTE
-
Real Estate
AMZW
-
QDTE
-
Technology
AMZW
-
QDTE
-
Utilities
AMZW
-
QDTE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZW vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank
AMZW
QDTE
AMZW vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZW | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.34 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 3.06 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 11.78 | -11.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZW vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and QDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZW | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -22.86% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.79% | -10.20% | -16.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.25% | -3.90% | -14.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.19% | -3.13% | -6.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.87% | 2.64% | +9.23% |
Volatility
AMZW vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) has a higher volatility of 12.09% compared to Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) at 8.57%. This indicates that AMZW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZW | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.09% | 8.57% | +3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.19% | 13.27% | +12.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.44% | 16.66% | +20.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 18.97% | +18.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 18.97% | +18.30% |
AMZW vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZW vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison
AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.16%, more than QDTE's 44.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 49.16% | 25.29% | 0.00% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 44.39% | 49.49% | 32.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZW and QDTE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZW has higher volatility (12.09%) compared to QDTE (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZW dropped -26.79% vs QDTE's -22.86%.
On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 31.05% vs 6.63% for AMZW. On fees, QDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, QDTE has been the lower-risk option at 8.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 31.05% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZW.
AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 49.16%, compared with 44.39% for QDTE.
Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZW and QDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer