AMZW vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZW returned 8.93% vs 299.04% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.29, they often move in opposite directions. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

AMZW vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -27.52% return.

AMZW

• 1D: -2.39%
• 1M: 1.52%
• 6M: 3.18%
• YTD: 7.08%
• 1Y: 8.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: 38.88%
• 6M: -2.59%
• YTD: -27.52%
• 1Y: 299.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZW vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	7.08%	7.33%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-27.52%	247.52%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZW and MSTZ is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	-0.29

Return for Risk

AMZW vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZW

AMZW Risk / Return Rank: 14
AMZW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
AMZW Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
AMZW Omega Ratio Rank: 15
AMZW Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
AMZW Martin Ratio Rank: 13

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZW vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZW	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	2.03	-1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	2.49	-1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.33	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.33	3.55	-3.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.72	6.84	-6.12

AMZW vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZW Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZW and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMZW vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZW	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.79%	-99.38%	+72.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.79%	-84.89%	+58.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.82%	-97.53%	+85.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.49%	-94.55%	+85.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.41%	43.95%	-31.54%

Volatility

AMZW vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) is 11.54%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 55.03%. This indicates that AMZW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZW	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.54%	55.03%	-43.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.54%	134.45%	-107.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.79%	148.58%	-110.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.08%	170.73%	-133.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.08%	170.73%	-133.65%

AMZW vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZW vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.90%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	45.90%	25.29%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZW and MSTZ in my portfolio?

AMZW and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZW or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (55.03%) compared to AMZW (11.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZW dropped -26.79% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, AMZW or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 299.04% vs 8.93% for AMZW. On fees, AMZW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMZW has been the lower-risk option at 11.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZW or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 299.04% return vs 8.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZW or MSTZ?

AMZW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZW or MSTZ?

AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 45.90%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between AMZW and MSTZ?

AMZW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.