AMZW vs. MSFW
AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and MSFW (Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
AMZW vs. MSFW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than MSFW's -14.73% return.
AMZW
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- -10.10%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFW
- 1D
- -3.61%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- -14.73%
- 6M
- -13.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZW vs. MSFW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 7.52% | -2.94% |
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | -14.73% | -7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZW and MSFW is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.33 |
AMZW vs. MSFW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZW
MSFW
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMZW
MSFW
-
Basic Materials
AMZW
-
MSFW
-
Communication Services
AMZW
-
MSFW
-
Consumer Defensive
AMZW
-
MSFW
-
Energy
AMZW
-
MSFW
-
Financial Services
AMZW
-
MSFW
-
Healthcare
AMZW
-
MSFW
-
Industrials
AMZW
-
MSFW
-
Real Estate
AMZW
-
MSFW
-
Technology
AMZW
-
MSFW
Utilities
AMZW
-
MSFW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZW vs. MSFW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZW | MSFW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | -0.76 | +1.20 |
Drawdowns
AMZW vs. MSFW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, smaller than the maximum MSFW drawdown of -40.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and MSFW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZW | MSFW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -40.42% | +13.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.45% | -26.27% | +14.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -17.45% | +8.56% |
Volatility
AMZW vs. MSFW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZW | MSFW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.99% | 32.40% | +4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.99% | 32.40% | +4.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.99% | 32.40% | +4.59% |
AMZW vs. MSFW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMZW and MSFW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
AMZW vs. MSFW - Dividend Comparison
AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.04%, more than MSFW's 39.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 43.04% | 25.29% |
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | 39.31% | 20.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZW and MSFW have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMZW and MSFW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 43.04%, compared with 39.31% for MSFW.
Find the right allocation for AMZW and MSFW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer