AMZW vs. DRAM
AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.
Performance
AMZW vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AMZW
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- -10.10%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRAM
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 64.14%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZW vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 22.30% |
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 151.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZW and DRAM is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2026 | 0.35 |
AMZW vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZW
DRAM
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMZW
DRAM
-
Basic Materials
AMZW
-
DRAM
-
Communication Services
AMZW
-
DRAM
-
Consumer Defensive
AMZW
-
DRAM
-
Energy
AMZW
-
DRAM
-
Financial Services
AMZW
-
DRAM
-
Healthcare
AMZW
-
DRAM
-
Industrials
AMZW
-
DRAM
-
Real Estate
AMZW
-
DRAM
-
Technology
AMZW
-
DRAM
Utilities
AMZW
-
DRAM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZW vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZW | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 341.95 | -341.51 |
Drawdowns
AMZW vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -10.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and DRAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZW | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -10.46% | -16.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.45% | 0.00% | -11.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -1.64% | -7.25% |
Volatility
AMZW vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZW | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.99% | 73.92% | -36.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.99% | 73.92% | -36.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.99% | 73.92% | -36.93% |
AMZW vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZW vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison
AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.04%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 43.04% | 25.29% |
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZW and DRAM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZW.
AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 43.04%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.
AMZW is categorized as Derivative Income, while DRAM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 0.65% for DRAM.
Find the right allocation for AMZW and DRAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer