PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZU vs. SOXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZU vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZU achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -92.10% return.


AMZU

1D
-5.04%
1M
-16.62%
YTD
8.04%
6M
5.52%
1Y
21.37%
3Y*
25.11%
5Y*
10Y*

SOXS

1D
-5.03%
1M
-62.97%
YTD
-92.10%
6M
-91.70%
1Y
-97.75%
3Y*
-86.64%
5Y*
-79.66%
10Y*
-78.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZU vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AMZU
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares
8.04%-11.59%60.99%118.70%-50.17%
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
-92.10%-85.53%-59.55%-84.56%-23.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZU and SOXS is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022

-0.52

The correlation between AMZU and SOXS shifts across timeframes, from -0.52 (all time) to -0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZU vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZU
AMZU Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AMZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZU Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZU Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXS
SOXS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SOXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZU vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZUSOXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.58

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

-1.00

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.13

-1.44

+2.57

AMZU vs. SOXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZU Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the SOXS Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZU and SOXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZUSOXSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

-0.96

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

-0.79

+1.04

Drawdowns

AMZU vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZU drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZU and SOXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZUSOXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.59%

-100.00%

+44.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.98%

-97.68%

+54.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.47%

-99.80%

+44.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.42%

-100.00%

+79.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.91%

-92.60%

+70.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.91%

68.64%

-49.73%

Volatility

AMZU vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) is 14.41%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a volatility of 44.22%. This indicates that AMZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZUSOXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.41%

44.22%

-29.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.64%

83.94%

-43.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.79%

102.18%

-42.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.16%

108.21%

-49.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.16%

100.48%

-41.32%

AMZU vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZU vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison

AMZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, less than SOXS's 68.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AMZU
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares
5.62%6.12%3.79%3.37%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
68.34%10.79%5.45%9.22%0.19%0.00%3.58%2.30%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZU and SOXS have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXS has higher volatility (44.22%) compared to AMZU (14.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZU dropped -55.59% vs SOXS's -100.00%.

On 3-year performance, AMZU leads with 25.11% vs -86.64% for SOXS. On fees, AMZU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, AMZU has been the lower-risk option at 14.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AMZU has performed better with a 25.11% return vs -86.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMZU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.

SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 68.34%, compared with 5.62% for AMZU.

AMZU tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (150%), while SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.06% for AMZU and 1.08% for SOXS.

AMZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZU and SOXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer