PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZU vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZU vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZU achieves a 20.75% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -35.77% return.


AMZU

1D
29.73%
1M
21.60%
6M
14.03%
YTD
20.75%
1Y
28.33%
3Y*
26.76%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.69%

SMST

1D
8.37%
1M
5.47%
6M
-29.35%
YTD
-35.77%
1Y
128.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-83.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$124.23M$117.55M$117.81M
$15.35M$15.12M$17.58M

AMZU vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMZU
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares
20.75%-11.59%40.07%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
-35.77%-44.36%-91.71%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZU and SMST is -0.33, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZU vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMZU
AMZU Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AMZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZU Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZU Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMZU vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZUSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.27

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

2.00

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.33

3.68

-3.34

AMZU vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZU Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZU and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZU vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZU drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZU and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZUSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.59%

-99.25%

+43.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.98%

-85.39%

+42.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.06%

-97.48%

+86.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.09%

-91.08%

+68.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.42%

46.35%

-24.93%

Volatility

AMZU vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) is 31.08%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 38.14%. This indicates that AMZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZUSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.08%

38.14%

-7.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.00%

135.29%

-83.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.05%

151.04%

-80.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.30%

166.75%

-105.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.30%

166.75%

-105.45%

AMZU vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZU has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZU vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

AMZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AMZU
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares
4.83%6.12%3.79%3.37%0.50%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZU and SMST have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (38.14%) compared to AMZU (31.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZU dropped -55.59% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 128.37% vs 28.33% for AMZU. On fees, AMZU is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMZU has been the lower-risk option at 31.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 128.37% return vs 28.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMZU is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

AMZU has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

AMZU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZU and 1.29% for SMST.

SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZU and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer