AMZU vs. LABU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

AMZU (Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares) and LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - AMZU tracks the Amazon.com, Inc. (150%) while LABU tracks the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMZU returned 19.98%/yr vs 6.07%/yr for LABU. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZU charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for LABU.

Performance

AMZU vs. LABU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZU achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than LABU's 12.06% return.

AMZU

• 1D: -2.47%
• 1M: -19.67%
• YTD: -2.29%
• 6M: 1.11%
• 1Y: 3.76%
• 3Y*: 19.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LABU

• 1D: 2.37%
• 1M: 3.51%
• YTD: 12.06%
• 6M: 8.94%
• 1Y: 207.12%
• 3Y*: 6.07%
• 5Y*: -34.35%
• 10Y*: -11.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZU vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares	-2.29%	-11.59%	60.99%	118.70%	-49.82%
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	12.06%	79.17%	-26.02%	-13.41%	-10.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZU and LABU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022	0.34

The correlation between AMZU and LABU shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AMZU vs. LABU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMZU	LABU
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.3%
Healthcare	-	99.7%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AMZU vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZU

AMZU Risk / Return Rank: 11
AMZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
AMZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
AMZU Omega Ratio Rank: 13
AMZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
AMZU Martin Ratio Rank: 10

LABU

LABU Risk / Return Rank: 83
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZU vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZU	LABU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.04	2.57	-2.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.50	2.89	-2.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.34	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.06	6.49	-6.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.14	18.31	-18.17

AMZU vs. LABU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZU Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the LABU Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZU and LABU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMZU vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZU drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZU and LABU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZU	LABU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.59%	-99.18%	+43.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.98%	-30.70%	-12.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.47%	-78.30%	+22.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-97.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.03%	-96.05%	+68.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.91%	-81.69%	+59.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.28%	10.91%	+8.37%

Volatility

AMZU vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) is 15.85%, while Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a volatility of 31.31%. This indicates that AMZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LABU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZU	LABU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.85%	31.31%	-15.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.43%	61.52%	-20.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.07%	77.69%	-17.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.12%	95.70%	-36.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.12%	95.45%	-36.33%

AMZU vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than LABU's 1.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZU vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison

AMZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, more than LABU's 0.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares	6.21%	6.12%	3.79%	3.37%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	0.69%	0.84%	0.35%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%	0.64%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZU and LABU in my portfolio?

AMZU and LABU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZU or LABU?

LABU has higher volatility (31.31%) compared to AMZU (15.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZU dropped -55.59% vs LABU's -99.18%.

Which ETF is better, AMZU or LABU?

On 3-year performance, AMZU leads with 19.98% vs 6.07% for LABU. On fees, AMZU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, AMZU has been the lower-risk option at 15.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZU or LABU?

Over the 3-year period, AMZU has performed better with a 19.98% return vs 6.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZU or LABU?

AMZU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for LABU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZU or LABU?

AMZU has the higher dividend yield at 6.21%, compared with 0.69% for LABU.

What is the main difference between AMZU and LABU?

AMZU tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (150%), while LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.06% for AMZU and 1.12% for LABU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.