AMZU vs. DLLL
AMZU (Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares) and DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - AMZU tracks the Amazon.com, Inc. (200%) while DLLL tracks the Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AMZU returned -1.46% vs 636.01% for DLLL. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZU charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DLLL.
Performance
AMZU vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZU achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 738.32% return.
AMZU
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- 6M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 1Y
- -1.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLLL
- 1D
- -3.72%
- 1M
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 819.94%
- YTD
- 738.32%
- 1Y
- 636.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZU vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | 3.21% | -17.18% |
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 738.32% | -3.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZU and DLLL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025 | 0.34 |
The correlation between AMZU and DLLL shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AMZU vs. DLLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZU
DLLL
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMZU
DLLL
-
Basic Materials
AMZU
-
DLLL
-
Communication Services
AMZU
-
DLLL
-
Consumer Defensive
AMZU
-
DLLL
-
Energy
AMZU
-
DLLL
-
Financial Services
AMZU
-
DLLL
-
Healthcare
AMZU
-
DLLL
-
Industrials
AMZU
-
DLLL
-
Real Estate
AMZU
-
DLLL
-
Technology
AMZU
-
DLLL
Utilities
AMZU
-
DLLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZU vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank
AMZU
DLLL
AMZU vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZU | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.50 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 11.22 | -11.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 22.48 | -22.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZU vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZU drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum DLLL drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZU and DLLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZU | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.59% | -68.58% | +12.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.98% | -57.19% | +14.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.98% | -20.70% | -3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.02% | -25.71% | +3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.53% | 28.50% | -7.97% |
Volatility
AMZU vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) is 19.94%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 35.23%. This indicates that AMZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZU | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.94% | 35.23% | -15.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.78% | 106.21% | -62.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.95% | 134.10% | -72.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.33% | 129.72% | -70.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.33% | 129.72% | -70.39% |
AMZU vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZU has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZU vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison
AMZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, while DLLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | 5.65% | 6.12% | 3.79% | 3.37% | 0.50% |
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZU and DLLL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLLL has higher volatility (35.23%) compared to AMZU (19.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZU dropped -55.59% vs DLLL's -68.58%.
On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 636.01% vs -1.46% for AMZU. On fees, AMZU is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMZU has been the lower-risk option at 19.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 636.01% return vs -1.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMZU is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.
AMZU has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 0.00% for DLLL.
AMZU tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (200%), while DLLL tracks Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZU and 1.50% for DLLL.
DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.80 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZU and DLLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer