PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZN vs. RYCEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMZN vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's 12.43% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has outperformed RYCEY with an annualized return of 20.83%, while RYCEY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.49% annualized return.


AMZN

1D
-1.23%
1M
-11.69%
YTD
3.35%
6M
5.46%
1Y
11.87%
3Y*
23.49%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
20.83%

RYCEY

1D
1.79%
1M
7.56%
YTD
12.43%
6M
19.66%
1Y
46.06%
3Y*
113.04%
5Y*
61.46%
10Y*
8.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZN vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
3.35%5.21%44.39%80.88%-49.62%2.38%76.26%23.03%28.43%55.96%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
12.43%123.64%88.21%253.27%-33.95%2.53%-82.05%-12.69%-7.35%40.70%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN and RYCEY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMZN:

$2.59T

RYCEY:

$147.86B

EPS

AMZN:

$8.37

RYCEY:

£0.99

PE Ratio

AMZN:

28.50

RYCEY:

13.26

PEG Ratio

AMZN:

0.69

RYCEY:

0.03

PS Ratio

AMZN:

3.48

RYCEY:

2.77

PB Ratio

AMZN:

5.87

RYCEY:

40.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMZN:

$742.78B

RYCEY:

£40.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMZN:

$348.59B

RYCEY:

£10.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMZN:

$152.71B

RYCEY:

£8.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZN vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZN vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZNRYCEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.23

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

2.13

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

5.98

-4.68

AMZN vs. RYCEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the RYCEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN and RYCEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZN vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, roughly equal to the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and RYCEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZNRYCEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.40%

-99.07%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.74%

-21.75%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-23.37%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.15%

-62.01%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.15%

-94.64%

+38.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.25%

-77.68%

+64.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.19%

-84.15%

+55.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.21%

7.73%

+1.48%

Volatility

AMZN vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) is 7.92%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a volatility of 12.00%. This indicates that AMZN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZNRYCEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

12.00%

-4.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.73%

32.70%

-11.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.13%

37.88%

-7.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.53%

43.48%

-7.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.48%

49.35%

-16.87%

Dividends

AMZN vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison

AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0.72%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.51%1.56%1.32%1.55%4.19%14.44%

Financials

AMZN vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com, Inc and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
181.52B
11.64B
(AMZN) Total Revenue
(RYCEY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AMZN values in USD, RYCEY values in GBP

AMZN vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amazon.com, Inc and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
36.8%
27.4%
Portfolio components
AMZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

RYCEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

AMZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

RYCEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

AMZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

RYCEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMZN and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYCEY has higher volatility (12.00%) compared to AMZN (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.

RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZN and RYCEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer