PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZN vs. RMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMZN vs. RMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than RMD's -18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has outperformed RMD with an annualized return of 20.83%, while RMD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.85% annualized return.


AMZN

1D
-1.23%
1M
-11.69%
YTD
3.35%
6M
5.46%
1Y
11.87%
3Y*
23.49%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
20.83%

RMD

1D
1.24%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
-18.71%
6M
-22.38%
1Y
-22.01%
3Y*
-2.26%
5Y*
-1.41%
10Y*
13.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZN vs. RMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
3.35%5.21%44.39%80.88%-49.62%2.38%76.26%23.03%28.43%55.96%
RMD
ResMed Inc.
-18.71%6.26%34.18%-16.55%-19.47%23.41%38.33%37.85%36.38%39.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN and RMD is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 1997

0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between AMZN and RMD has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

AMZN:

$8.37

RMD:

$13.78

PE Ratio

AMZN:

28.50

RMD:

14.14

PEG Ratio

AMZN:

0.69

RMD:

0.44

PS Ratio

AMZN:

3.48

RMD:

3.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMZN:

$742.78B

RMD:

$5.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMZN:

$348.59B

RMD:

$3.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMZN:

$152.71B

RMD:

$2.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZN vs. RMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

RMD
RMD Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMD Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
RMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMD Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZN vs. RMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZNRMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.86

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

-0.59

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

-1.34

+2.63

AMZN vs. RMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the RMD Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN and RMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZN vs. RMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than RMD's maximum drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and RMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZNRMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.40%

-61.61%

-32.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.74%

-37.28%

+15.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-40.09%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.15%

-53.99%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.15%

-53.99%

-2.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.25%

-33.18%

+19.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.19%

-16.00%

-12.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.21%

16.49%

-7.28%

Volatility

AMZN vs. RMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) is 7.92%, while ResMed Inc. (RMD) has a volatility of 9.81%. This indicates that AMZN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZNRMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

9.81%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.73%

19.30%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.13%

24.09%

+6.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.53%

31.07%

+4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.48%

31.54%

+0.94%

Dividends

AMZN vs. RMD - Dividend Comparison

AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RMD
ResMed Inc.
1.23%0.94%0.88%1.07%0.83%0.62%0.73%0.98%1.26%1.61%2.03%2.16%

Financials

AMZN vs. RMD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com, Inc and ResMed Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
181.52B
1.43B
(AMZN) Total Revenue
(RMD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMZN vs. RMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amazon.com, Inc and ResMed Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
36.8%
62.3%
Portfolio components
AMZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

RMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a gross profit of 890.98M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.3%.

AMZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

RMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported an operating income of 499.81M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.

AMZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

RMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a net income of 398.73M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMZN and RMD have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMD has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to AMZN (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs RMD's -61.61%.

AMZN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZN and RMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer