AMZN vs. EGLN.L
AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) is a stock, while EGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Over the past 10 years, AMZN returned 20.83%/yr vs 11.12%/yr for EGLN.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMZN vs. EGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AMZN is traded in USD, while EGLN.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EGLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than EGLN.L's -2.27% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has outperformed EGLN.L with an annualized return of 20.83%, while EGLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.12% annualized return.
AMZN
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -11.69%
- YTD
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- 1Y
- 11.87%
- 3Y*
- 23.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 20.83%
EGLN.L
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -10.28%
- YTD
- -2.27%
- 6M
- -1.66%
- 1Y
- 24.16%
- 3Y*
- 29.23%
- 5Y*
- 17.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
AMZN vs. EGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 3.35% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 80.88% | -49.62% | 2.38% | 76.26% | 23.03% | 28.43% | 55.96% |
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -2.27% | 65.63% | 26.01% | 12.82% | -0.37% | -3.23% | 23.75% | 18.25% | -1.44% | 13.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZN and EGLN.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZN vs. EGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
AMZN
EGLN.L
AMZN vs. EGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZN | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.19 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 1.06 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 3.23 | -1.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZN vs. EGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than EGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and EGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZN | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.40% | -59.11% | -35.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.74% | -22.68% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | -22.68% | -8.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.15% | -22.68% | -33.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.15% | -26.49% | -29.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.25% | -20.57% | +7.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.19% | -33.85% | +5.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.21% | 7.44% | +1.77% |
Volatility
AMZN vs. EGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) at 7.25%. This indicates that AMZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZN | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 7.25% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.73% | 21.66% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.13% | 24.87% | +5.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 18.43% | +17.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.48% | 17.10% | +15.38% |
Dividends
AMZN vs. EGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMZN nor EGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZN and EGLN.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AMZN and EGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer