PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZN vs. CRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMZN vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and salesforce.com, inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 8.32% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -27.87% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has outperformed CRM with an annualized return of 21.29%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.89% annualized return.


AMZN

1D
-2.53%
1M
-8.10%
YTD
8.32%
6M
7.59%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
26.25%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
21.29%

CRM

1D
-5.09%
1M
2.77%
YTD
-27.87%
6M
-19.82%
1Y
-27.39%
3Y*
-3.17%
5Y*
-4.02%
10Y*
8.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZN vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
8.32%5.21%44.39%80.88%-49.62%2.38%76.26%23.03%28.43%55.96%
CRM
salesforce.com, inc.
-27.87%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%18.74%33.98%49.33%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN and CRM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2004

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between AMZN and CRM has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMZN:

$2.72T

CRM:

$166.02B

EPS

AMZN:

$8.37

CRM:

$8.59

PE Ratio

AMZN:

29.87

CRM:

22.18

PEG Ratio

AMZN:

0.72

CRM:

0.05

PS Ratio

AMZN:

3.65

CRM:

4.16

PB Ratio

AMZN:

6.15

CRM:

4.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMZN:

$742.78B

CRM:

$42.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMZN:

$348.59B

CRM:

$33.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMZN:

$152.71B

CRM:

$12.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZN vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZN vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and salesforce.com, inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZNCRMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

-0.73

+1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.18

-0.89

+2.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.89

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

-0.70

+1.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.39

-1.36

+3.75

AMZN vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZNCRMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

-0.73

+1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

-0.11

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.25

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.46

+0.11

Drawdowns

AMZN vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than CRM's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and CRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZNCRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.40%

-70.50%

-23.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.74%

-39.46%

+17.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-54.70%

+23.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.15%

-58.62%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.15%

-58.62%

+2.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.08%

-47.66%

+38.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.12%

-16.10%

-12.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.02%

20.18%

-11.16%

Volatility

AMZN vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) is 7.24%, while salesforce.com, inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 17.31%. This indicates that AMZN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZNCRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

17.31%

-10.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.35%

31.96%

-11.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.00%

37.89%

-7.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.50%

37.02%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.46%

35.34%

-2.88%

Dividends

AMZN vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.


PositionTTM20252024
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%
CRM
salesforce.com, inc.
0.89%0.63%0.48%

Financials

AMZN vs. CRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com, Inc and salesforce.com, inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
181.52B
11.13B
(AMZN) Total Revenue
(CRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMZN vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amazon.com, Inc and salesforce.com, inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
36.8%
76.9%
Portfolio components
AMZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, salesforce.com, inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

AMZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, salesforce.com, inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

AMZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, salesforce.com, inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMZN and CRM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRM has higher volatility (17.31%) compared to AMZN (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs CRM's -70.50%.

AMZN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZN and CRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer