AMZN.NEO vs. RGTI
AMZN.NEO (Amazon.com CDR) and RGTI (Rigetti Computing Inc) are both stocks. AMZN.NEO operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while RGTI operates in Computer Hardware (Technology). Over the past 3 years, AMZN.NEO returned 22.80%/yr vs 178.49%/yr for RGTI. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMZN.NEO vs. RGTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AMZN.NEO is traded in CAD, while RGTI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RGTI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZN.NEO achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly higher than RGTI's 4.50% return.
AMZN.NEO
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -7.04%
- YTD
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- 1Y
- 13.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTI
- 1D
- 8.13%
- 1M
- 29.39%
- YTD
- 4.50%
- 6M
- -2.16%
- 1Y
- 104.50%
- 3Y*
- 178.49%
- 5Y*
- 21.58%
- 10Y*
- —
AMZN.NEO vs. RGTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN.NEO Amazon.com CDR | 5.45% | 2.68% | 41.82% | 78.72% | -50.79% | -10.18% |
RGTI Rigetti Computing Inc | 4.50% | 38.52% | 1,580.59% | 31.85% | -92.46% | 7.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZN.NEO and RGTI is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2021 | 0.30 |
Fundamentals
AMZN.NEO:
CA$301.80B
RGTI:
$7.61B
AMZN.NEO:
$7.17
RGTI:
-$0.71
AMZN.NEO:
0.31
RGTI:
718.71
AMZN.NEO:
0.58
RGTI:
13.05
AMZN.NEO:
$691.33B
RGTI:
$10.02M
AMZN.NEO:
$345.98B
RGTI:
$3.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZN.NEO vs. RGTI — Risk / Return Rank
AMZN.NEO
RGTI
AMZN.NEO vs. RGTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) and Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZN.NEO | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.22 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 1.36 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | 2.07 | -0.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZN.NEO vs. RGTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZN.NEO drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, smaller than the maximum RGTI drawdown of -96.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN.NEO and RGTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZN.NEO | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.92% | -96.64% | +39.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.03% | -77.34% | +55.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.29% | -78.23% | +46.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -96.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.08% | -59.94% | +48.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.74% | -58.71% | +38.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.56% | 50.61% | -41.05% |
Volatility
AMZN.NEO vs. RGTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) is 8.58%, while Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a volatility of 45.32%. This indicates that AMZN.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZN.NEO | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 45.32% | -36.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.60% | 71.95% | -51.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.83% | 109.63% | -79.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.55% | 129.08% | -93.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.55% | 127.18% | -91.63% |
Dividends
AMZN.NEO vs. RGTI - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMZN.NEO nor RGTI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AMZN.NEO vs. RGTI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com CDR and Rigetti Computing Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZN.NEO and RGTI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AMZN.NEO and RGTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer