AMZN.NEO vs. CMB1.L
AMZN.NEO (Amazon.com CDR) is a stock, while CMB1.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)) is Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Over the past 3 years, AMZN.NEO returned 22.80%/yr vs 33.65%/yr for CMB1.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMZN.NEO vs. CMB1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AMZN.NEO is traded in CAD, while CMB1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMB1.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZN.NEO achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly lower than CMB1.L's 19.32% return.
AMZN.NEO
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -7.04%
- YTD
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- 1Y
- 13.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMB1.L
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 19.32%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 41.63%
- 3Y*
- 33.65%
- 5Y*
- 22.77%
- 10Y*
- 17.08%
AMZN.NEO vs. CMB1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN.NEO Amazon.com CDR | 5.45% | 2.68% | 41.82% | 78.72% | -50.79% | -10.18% |
CMB1.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) | 19.32% | 47.62% | 20.80% | 34.30% | -8.41% | 6.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZN.NEO and CMB1.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2021 | 0.30 |
The correlation between AMZN.NEO and CMB1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZN.NEO vs. CMB1.L — Risk / Return Rank
AMZN.NEO
CMB1.L
AMZN.NEO vs. CMB1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZN.NEO | CMB1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.40 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 3.81 | -3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | 13.20 | -11.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZN.NEO vs. CMB1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZN.NEO drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, roughly equal to the maximum CMB1.L drawdown of -56.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN.NEO and CMB1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZN.NEO | CMB1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.92% | -56.63% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.03% | -10.86% | -11.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.29% | -17.82% | -13.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.08% | 0.00% | -11.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.74% | -14.31% | -5.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.56% | 3.14% | +6.42% |
Volatility
AMZN.NEO vs. CMB1.L - Volatility Comparison
Amazon.com CDR (AMZN.NEO) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) at 5.00%. This indicates that AMZN.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMB1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZN.NEO | CMB1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 5.00% | +3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.60% | 14.04% | +6.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.83% | 17.32% | +12.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.55% | 21.64% | +13.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.55% | 23.16% | +12.39% |
Dividends
AMZN.NEO vs. CMB1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMZN.NEO nor CMB1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZN.NEO and CMB1.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AMZN.NEO and CMB1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer