PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CMB1.L vs. XDEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CMB1.L vs. XDEM.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CMB1.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDEM.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - CMB1.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR, while XDEM.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CMB1.L returned 16.24%/yr vs 17.01%/yr for XDEM.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CMB1.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEM.L.

Performance

CMB1.L vs. XDEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMB1.L achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly lower than XDEM.L's 23.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CMB1.L having a 16.24% annualized return and XDEM.L not far ahead at 17.01%.

CMB1.L

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.16%
YTD
13.57%
6M
17.25%
1Y
34.15%
3Y*
28.69%
5Y*
19.90%
10Y*
16.24%

XDEM.L

1D
1.40%
1M
11.96%
YTD
23.18%
6M
24.68%
1Y
36.45%
3Y*
26.71%
5Y*
15.08%
10Y*
17.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMB1.L vs. XDEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)		13.57%43.83%13.25%30.68%-3.56%18.29%1.52%24.83%-12.74%21.01%
XDEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C		23.18%12.52%32.87%5.88%-8.06%15.61%24.14%23.37%2.28%20.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CMB1.L and XDEM.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014

0.58

The correlation between CMB1.L and XDEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

CMB1.L vs. XDEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CMB1.L
XDEM.L

Financial Services

45.1%
18.9%

Utilities

17.2%
2.6%

Industrials

10.8%
20.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
1.2%

Energy

8.8%
1.8%

Technology

4.6%
34.6%

Healthcare

1.1%
6.0%

Communication Services

1.1%
7.2%

Basic Materials

0.6%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.0%

Financial Services

CMB1.L
45.1%
XDEM.L
18.9%

Utilities

CMB1.L
17.2%
XDEM.L
2.6%

Industrials

CMB1.L
10.8%
XDEM.L
20.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CMB1.L
10.0%
XDEM.L
1.2%

Energy

CMB1.L
8.8%
XDEM.L
1.8%

Technology

CMB1.L
4.6%
XDEM.L
34.6%

Healthcare

CMB1.L
1.1%
XDEM.L
6.0%

Communication Services

CMB1.L
1.1%
XDEM.L
7.2%

Basic Materials

CMB1.L
0.6%
XDEM.L
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

CMB1.L
0.5%
XDEM.L
1.2%

Real Estate

CMB1.L
0.3%
XDEM.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)

Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C

Often compared with CMB1.L:
CMB1.L vs. IITU.LCMB1.L vs. H50E.LCMB1.L vs. SPYCMB1.L vs. X7PP.LCMB1.L vs. IQSA.LCMB1.L vs. EQQQ.LCMB1.L vs. XMBR.L
Often compared with XDEM.L:
XDEM.L vs. XDEV.LXDEM.L vs. XDEM.DEXDEM.L vs. VHVG.LXDEM.L vs. MVOL.LXDEM.L vs. XDEB.LXDEM.L vs. EXCS.LXDEM.L vs. IUMF.L

Return for Risk

CMB1.L vs. XDEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CMB1.L
CMB1.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
XDEM.L
XDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMB1.L vs. XDEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CMB1.LXDEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.26
2.25

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.07
3.31

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

4.03

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.01

15.69

-3.68

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMB1.L vs. XDEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMB1.L and XDEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CMB1.LXDEM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.25

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

0.92

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

1.01

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.97

-0.50

Drawdowns

CMB1.L vs. XDEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMB1.L drawdown since its inception was -47.37%, which is greater than XDEM.L's maximum drawdown of -22.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMB1.L and XDEM.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CMB1.LXDEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.37%

-22.42%

-24.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-9.01%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.62%

-19.99%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-20.13%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.61%

-22.42%

-14.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

0.00%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-4.99%

-3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.32%

+0.52%

Volatility

CMB1.L vs. XDEM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) is 4.47%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that CMB1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CMB1.LXDEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

5.92%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.15%

13.77%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.06%

16.16%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.00%

16.41%

+1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.52%

16.80%

+2.72%

CMB1.L vs. XDEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMB1.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEM.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMB1.L vs. XDEM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMB1.L nor XDEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

CMB1.L and XDEM.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CMB1.L.

CMB1.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XDEM.L is Momentum. CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR, while XDEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CMB1.L and 0.25% for XDEM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMB1.L and XDEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer