AMZD vs. TSLS
AMZD (Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares) and TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion - AMZD tracks the Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%) while TSLS tracks the Tesla Inc (--100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMZD returned -20.92%/yr vs -30.15%/yr for TSLS. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZD charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for TSLS.
Performance
AMZD vs. TSLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZD achieves a -9.22% return, which is significantly lower than TSLS's 8.52% return.
AMZD
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- 6M
- -6.33%
- YTD
- -9.22%
- 1Y
- -13.56%
- 3Y*
- -20.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLS
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- -26.98%
- 3Y*
- -30.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZD vs. TSLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | -9.22% | -9.84% | -30.80% | -46.50% | 45.25% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 8.52% | -34.95% | -55.71% | -60.12% | 95.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZD and TSLS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZD vs. TSLS — Risk / Return Rank
AMZD
TSLS
AMZD vs. TSLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZD | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.93 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | -0.65 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | -0.92 | -0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZD vs. TSLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZD drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, smaller than the maximum TSLS drawdown of -90.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZD and TSLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZD | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.05% | -90.73% | +17.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.27% | -41.36% | +13.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.20% | -84.16% | +24.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.46% | -89.06% | +18.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.67% | -64.18% | +14.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.45% | 29.23% | -15.78% |
Volatility
AMZD vs. TSLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) is 9.79%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) has a volatility of 17.06%. This indicates that AMZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZD | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.79% | 17.06% | -7.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.10% | 31.45% | -9.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.28% | 45.14% | -13.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.38% | 58.73% | -25.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.38% | 58.73% | -25.35% |
AMZD vs. TSLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZD has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLS's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZD vs. TSLS - Dividend Comparison
AMZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than TSLS's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | 3.41% | 3.61% | 5.15% | 6.83% | 2.45% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 2.90% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZD and TSLS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLS has higher volatility (17.06%) compared to AMZD (9.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZD dropped -73.05% vs TSLS's -90.73%.
On 3-year performance, AMZD leads with -20.92% vs -30.15% for TSLS. On fees, TSLS is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, AMZD has been the lower-risk option at 9.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AMZD has performed better with a -20.92% return vs -30.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLS is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZD.
AMZD has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 2.90% for TSLS.
AMZD tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%), while TSLS tracks Tesla Inc (--100%). Their fees differ too: 1.09% for AMZD and 1.07% for TSLS.
AMZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZD and TSLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer