AMZD vs. SEF
AMZD (Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares) and SEF (ProShares Short Financials) are both Inverse Equities funds - AMZD tracks the Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%) while SEF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMZD returned -22.66%/yr vs -10.34%/yr for SEF. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZD charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SEF.
Performance
AMZD vs. SEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZD achieves a -8.90% return, which is significantly lower than SEF's 8.89% return.
AMZD
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- -8.90%
- 6M
- -8.11%
- 1Y
- -19.87%
- 3Y*
- -22.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEF
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- -10.34%
- 5Y*
- -5.21%
- 10Y*
- -11.50%
AMZD vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | -8.90% | -9.84% | -30.80% | -46.50% | 45.25% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 8.89% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | -0.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZD and SEF is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZD vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank
AMZD
SEF
AMZD vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.06 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 0.39 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 0.73 | -2.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 0.26 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | -0.49 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
AMZD vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZD drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, smaller than the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZD and SEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.05% | -96.51% | +23.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.27% | -9.72% | -18.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.20% | -39.40% | -19.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.36% | -96.09% | +25.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.11% | -82.72% | +33.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.24% | 5.14% | +8.10% |
Volatility
AMZD vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to ProShares Short Financials (SEF) at 3.01%. This indicates that AMZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 3.01% | +4.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.49% | 10.85% | +9.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.15% | 14.34% | +15.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.41% | 17.96% | +15.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.41% | 20.52% | +12.89% |
AMZD vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZD has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZD vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison
AMZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than SEF's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | 3.44% | 3.61% | 5.15% | 6.83% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.35% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZD and SEF have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZD has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to SEF (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZD dropped -73.05% vs SEF's -96.51%.
On 3-year performance, SEF leads with -10.34% vs -22.66% for AMZD. On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEF has performed better with a -10.34% return vs -22.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZD.
AMZD has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 3.35% for SEF.
AMZD tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%), while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for AMZD and 0.95% for SEF.
SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZD and SEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer