AMZD vs. CARD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMZD (Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds - AMZD tracks the Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%) while CARD tracks the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AMZD returned -19.87% vs -35.78% for CARD. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZD charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CARD.

Performance

AMZD vs. CARD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZD achieves a -8.90% return, which is significantly lower than CARD's -2.60% return.

AMZD

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: 8.70%
• YTD: -8.90%
• 6M: -8.11%
• 1Y: -19.87%
• 3Y*: -22.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CARD

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: -13.67%
• YTD: -2.60%
• 6M: -2.07%
• 1Y: -35.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZD vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares	-8.90%	-9.84%	-30.80%	-15.51%
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-2.60%	-60.21%	-58.19%	-30.38%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZD and CARD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023	0.40

Return for Risk

AMZD vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZD

AMZD Risk / Return Rank: 3
AMZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
AMZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
AMZD Omega Ratio Rank: 3
AMZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
AMZD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CARD

CARD Risk / Return Rank: 4
CARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CARD Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CARD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZD vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMZD	CARD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	-0.52	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.80	-0.43	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	0.95	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	-0.72	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.54	-1.06	-0.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMZD vs. CARD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZD Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is comparable to the CARD Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZD and CARD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMZD	CARD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.66	-0.52	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.59	-0.65	+0.06

Drawdowns

AMZD vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZD drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, smaller than the maximum CARD drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZD and CARD.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZD	CARD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.05%	-93.51%	+20.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.27%	-49.57%	+21.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.36%	-92.68%	+22.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.11%	-68.13%	+19.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.24%	33.93%	-20.69%

Volatility

AMZD vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) is 7.23%, while Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a volatility of 22.80%. This indicates that AMZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZD	CARD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.23%	22.80%	-15.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.49%	50.05%	-29.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.15%	68.70%	-38.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.41%	80.53%	-47.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.41%	80.53%	-47.12%

AMZD vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZD has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZD vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison

AMZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares	3.44%	3.61%	5.15%	6.83%	2.45%
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZD and CARD in my portfolio?

AMZD and CARD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZD or CARD?

CARD has higher volatility (22.80%) compared to AMZD (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZD dropped -73.05% vs CARD's -93.51%.

Which ETF is better, AMZD or CARD?

On 1-year performance, AMZD leads with -19.87% vs -35.78% for CARD. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, AMZD has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZD or CARD?

Over the 1-year period, AMZD has performed better with a -19.87% return vs -35.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZD or CARD?

CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZD or CARD?

AMZD has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.

What is the main difference between AMZD and CARD?

AMZD tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%), while CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for AMZD and 0.95% for CARD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.