AMZA vs. DGRO
AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. AMZA is actively managed, while DGRO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMZA returned 5.02%/yr vs 13.62%/yr for DGRO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZA charges 2.01%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
AMZA vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 22.69% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 9.19% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZA has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 5.02%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.62% annualized return.
AMZA
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- 22.69%
- 6M
- 22.31%
- 1Y
- 19.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.70%
- 5Y*
- 19.14%
- 10Y*
- 5.02%
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
AMZA vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 22.69% | 0.17% | 30.90% | 23.35% | 33.20% | 51.22% | -49.25% | 6.27% | -26.78% | -6.90% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.19% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZA and DGRO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AMZA and DGRO has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
AMZA vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZA
DGRO
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Energy
AMZA
DGRO
Utilities
AMZA
DGRO
Basic Materials
AMZA
-
DGRO
Communication Services
AMZA
-
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
AMZA
-
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
AMZA
-
DGRO
Financial Services
AMZA
-
DGRO
Healthcare
AMZA
-
DGRO
Industrials
AMZA
-
DGRO
Real Estate
AMZA
-
DGRO
-
Technology
AMZA
-
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZA vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
AMZA
DGRO
AMZA vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZA | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.42 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 3.45 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.87 | 13.31 | -9.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZA vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZA | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.46% | -35.10% | -56.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -6.47% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.56% | -14.03% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -19.31% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.84% | -35.10% | -51.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.84% | -0.90% | -8.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.85% | -3.43% | -41.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.95% | 1.67% | +3.28% |
Volatility
AMZA vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.63%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZA | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 2.63% | +3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.53% | 6.94% | +6.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.92% | 9.53% | +8.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.67% | 13.80% | +11.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.20% | 16.60% | +20.60% |
AMZA vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZA vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.16%, more than DGRO's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 8.16% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.97% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZA and DGRO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZA has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to DGRO (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZA dropped -91.46% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.62% vs 5.02% for AMZA. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.62% return vs 5.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.
AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 8.16%, compared with 1.97% for DGRO.
AMZA is categorized as MLPs, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.01% for AMZA and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZA and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer