PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMUU vs. NUGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMUU vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMUU achieves a 332.97% return, which is significantly higher than NUGT's -37.41% return.


AMUU

1D
0.18%
1M
16.11%
YTD
332.97%
6M
329.05%
1Y
724.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUGT

1D
-7.97%
1M
-25.90%
YTD
-37.41%
6M
-43.27%
1Y
55.32%
3Y*
51.47%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
-12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMUU vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AMUU and NUGT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2025

0.19

AMUU vs. NUGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMUU
NUGT

Technology

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AMUU
100.0%
NUGT

-

Basic Materials

AMUU

-

NUGT
100.0%

Communication Services

AMUU

-

NUGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

AMUU

-

NUGT

-

Consumer Defensive

AMUU

-

NUGT

-

Energy

AMUU

-

NUGT

-

Financial Services

AMUU

-

NUGT

-

Healthcare

AMUU

-

NUGT

-

Industrials

AMUU

-

NUGT

-

Real Estate

AMUU

-

NUGT

-

Utilities

AMUU

-

NUGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMUU vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMUU
AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMUU vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMUUNUGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.18

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.99

0.88

+12.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.23

2.07

+23.16

AMUU vs. NUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMUU Sharpe Ratio is 5.46, which is higher than the NUGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMUU and NUGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMUU vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUU drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUU and NUGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMUUNUGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.47%

-99.97%

+43.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.31%

-63.43%

+7.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.23%

-99.85%

+87.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-91.53%

+69.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.94%

26.81%

+2.13%

Volatility

AMUU vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) has a higher volatility of 48.05% compared to Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) at 35.78%. This indicates that AMUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMUUNUGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.05%

35.78%

+12.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.70%

80.55%

+21.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

134.64%

94.63%

+40.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

133.36%

73.02%

+60.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

133.36%

87.99%

+45.37%

AMUU vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMUU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMUU vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison

AMUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than NUGT's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AMUU
Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares
3.47%13.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
0.62%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMUU and NUGT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMUU has higher volatility (48.05%) compared to NUGT (35.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMUU dropped -56.47% vs NUGT's -99.97%.

On 1-year performance, AMUU leads with 724.72% vs 55.32% for NUGT. On fees, AMUU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, NUGT has been the lower-risk option at 35.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMUU has performed better with a 724.72% return vs 55.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMUU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.

AMUU has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 0.62% for NUGT.

AMUU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NUGT is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for AMUU and 1.13% for NUGT.

AMUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.46 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMUU and NUGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer