AMUU vs. NRGU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AMUU (Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AMUU is actively managed, while NRGU is passively managed. Over the past year, AMUU returned 1076.72% vs 171.19% for NRGU. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMUU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.

Performance

AMUU vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMUU achieves a 361.36% return, which is significantly higher than NRGU's 125.94% return.

AMUU

• 1D: -6.47%
• 1M: 102.88%
• YTD: 361.36%
• 6M: 344.98%
• 1Y: 1,076.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: -1.47%
• 1M: -6.46%
• YTD: 125.94%
• 6M: 93.16%
• 1Y: 171.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMUU vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	361.36%	135.74%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	125.94%	-33.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AMUU and NRGU is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.12

The correlation between AMUU and NRGU shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AMUU vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMUU	NRGU
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AMUU vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMUU

AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 96
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 96

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 64
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 53
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMUU vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMUU	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	8.38	2.31	+6.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.65	2.55	+2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.32	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	19.33	4.31	+15.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	37.88	10.74	+27.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMUU vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMUU Sharpe Ratio is 8.38, which is higher than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMUU and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMUU	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.38	2.31	+6.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.16	0.43	+3.73

Drawdowns

AMUU vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUU drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, roughly equal to the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUU and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMUU	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.47%	-57.50%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.31%	-39.95%	-16.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.47%	-22.07%	+15.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.79%	-25.41%	+2.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.68%	16.01%	+12.67%

Volatility

AMUU vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) has a higher volatility of 46.75% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) at 31.62%. This indicates that AMUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMUU	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	46.75%	31.62%	+15.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	94.42%	61.19%	+33.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	129.86%	75.02%	+54.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	131.25%	89.03%	+42.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	131.25%	89.03%	+42.22%

AMUU vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMUU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMUU vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

AMUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	3.02%	13.58%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMUU and NRGU in my portfolio?

AMUU and NRGU have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMUU or NRGU?

AMUU has higher volatility (46.75%) compared to NRGU (31.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMUU dropped -56.47% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

Which ETF is better, AMUU or NRGU?

On 1-year performance, AMUU leads with 1076.72% vs 171.19% for NRGU. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NRGU has been the lower-risk option at 31.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMUU or NRGU?

Over the 1-year period, AMUU has performed better with a 1076.72% return vs 171.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMUU or NRGU?

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for AMUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMUU or NRGU?

AMUU has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

What is the main difference between AMUU and NRGU?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for AMUU and 0.95% for NRGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.38 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.