AMUU vs. NRGU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU).

AMUU and NRGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMUU is an actively managed fund by Direxion. It was launched on Feb 12, 2025. NRGU is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 9, 2019.

Performance

AMUU vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMUU vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	-16.43%	135.74%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	139.49%	-33.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMUU achieves a -16.43% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 139.49% return.

AMUU

• 1D: 6.74%
• 1M: 8.13%
• YTD: -16.43%
• 6M: 22.30%
• 1Y: 152.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: -10.75%
• 1M: 24.81%
• YTD: 139.49%
• 6M: 107.68%
• 1Y: 69.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMUU vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMUU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

AMUU

Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares

NRGU

MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN

Return for Risk

AMUU vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMUU

AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 71
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 75
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 51

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 45
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMUU vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMUU	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	0.79	+0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	1.48	+0.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.21	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	1.29	+1.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.24	2.64	+2.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMUU vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMUU Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMUU and NRGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMUU	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	0.79	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.61	+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between AMUU and NRGU is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AMUU vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

AMUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.69%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	16.69%	13.58%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AMUU vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUU drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, roughly equal to the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUU and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMUU	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.47%	-57.50%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.31%	-55.24%	-1.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.89%	-17.40%	-31.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.57%	-25.38%	+0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.96%	27.12%	+1.84%

Volatility

AMUU vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) has a higher volatility of 32.54% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) at 23.31%. This indicates that AMUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMUU	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.54%	23.31%	+9.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	98.33%	50.27%	+48.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	130.03%	88.18%	+41.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	125.95%	87.12%	+38.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	125.95%	87.12%	+38.83%