AMUU vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AMUU (Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. Both are actively managed. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.97% expense ratio.

Performance

AMUU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMUU achieves a 246.53% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 266.23% return.

AMUU

• 1D: 2.97%
• 1M: -18.43%
• 6M: 170.23%
• YTD: 246.53%
• 1Y: 341.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 338.06%

LINT

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -46.62%
• 6M: 135.02%
• YTD: 266.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	$20.32M	$21.75M	$27.81M
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.84M	$20.02M	$35.16M

AMUU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	246.53%	-16.95%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	266.23%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AMUU and LINT is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.70

AMUU vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMUU	LINT
Technology	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AMUU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMUU

AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 87
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 82

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMUU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMUU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.11	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.49	—	—

Drawdowns

AMUU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUU drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUU and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMUU	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.47%	-69.02%	+12.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.02%	-62.23%	+27.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.32%	-24.07%	+1.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.89%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMUU	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	48.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	111.35%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	142.53%	169.02%	-26.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	135.84%	169.02%	-33.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	135.84%	169.02%	-33.18%

AMUU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMUU and LINT have an expense ratio of 0.97%.

Dividends

AMUU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

AMUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than LINT's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	4.34%	13.58%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.74%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMUU and LINT in my portfolio?

AMUU and LINT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMUU or LINT?

Both ETFs have the same 0.97% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMUU or LINT?

AMUU and LINT have the same expense ratio: 0.97% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMUU or LINT?

AMUU has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 0.74% for LINT.