PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMUU vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMUU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMUU achieves a 390.11% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 869.59% return.


AMUU

1D
5.57%
1M
31.43%
YTD
390.11%
6M
385.03%
1Y
984.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
10.62%
1M
28.51%
YTD
869.59%
6M
899.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMUU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AMUU
Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares
390.11%-16.95%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
869.59%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AMUU and LINT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.64

AMUU vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMUU
LINT

Technology

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AMUU
100.0%
LINT
100.0%

Basic Materials

AMUU

-

LINT

-

Communication Services

AMUU

-

LINT

-

Consumer Cyclical

AMUU

-

LINT

-

Consumer Defensive

AMUU

-

LINT

-

Energy

AMUU

-

LINT

-

Financial Services

AMUU

-

LINT

-

Healthcare

AMUU

-

LINT

-

Industrials

AMUU

-

LINT

-

Real Estate

AMUU

-

LINT

-

Utilities

AMUU

-

LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMUU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMUU
AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMUU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMUULINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.34

AMUU vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMUU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUU drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUU and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMUULINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.47%

-49.54%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

0.00%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.50%

-20.53%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.92%

Volatility

AMUU vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMUULINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

134.26%

168.26%

-34.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

133.29%

168.26%

-34.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

133.29%

168.26%

-34.97%

AMUU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMUU and LINT have an expense ratio of 0.97%.


Dividends

AMUU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

AMUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than LINT's 0.09% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMUU and LINT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.97% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMUU and LINT have the same expense ratio: 0.97% per year.

AMUU has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.09% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMUU and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer