AMUU vs. COTG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMUU (Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. AMUU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.

Performance

AMUU vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMUU achieves a 331.08% return, which is significantly higher than COTG's 15.84% return.

AMUU

• 1D: -12.04%
• 1M: 15.60%
• YTD: 331.08%
• 6M: 327.10%
• 1Y: 833.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COTG

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -14.19%
• YTD: 15.84%
• 6M: 17.42%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMUU vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	331.08%	54.53%
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	15.84%	-22.61%

Correlation

The correlation between AMUU and COTG is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

AMUU vs. COTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMUU

AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 95
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 95

COTG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMUU vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMUU	COTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.25	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.07	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.95	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.04	—	—

Drawdowns

AMUU vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUU drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUU and COTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMUU	COTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.47%	-25.69%	-30.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.61%	-24.45%	+11.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.47%	-9.72%	-12.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMUU	COTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	48.61%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	102.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	134.66%	40.02%	+94.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	133.57%	40.02%	+93.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	133.57%	40.02%	+93.55%

AMUU vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMUU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMUU vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

AMUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, while COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	3.24%	13.58%
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMUU and COTG in my portfolio?

AMUU and COTG have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMUU or COTG?

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMUU or COTG?

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for AMUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMUU or COTG?

AMUU has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.

What is the main difference between AMUU and COTG?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for AMUU and 0.75% for COTG.