PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMTM vs. JGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMTM vs. JGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amentum Holdings Inc (AMTM) and JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMTM vs. JGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMTM
Amentum Holdings Inc
-9.17%37.90%-28.74%
JGRO
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF
-8.00%14.71%5.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMTM achieves a -9.17% return, which is significantly lower than JGRO's -8.00% return.


AMTM

1D
1.00%
1M
-14.20%
YTD
-9.17%
6M
4.69%
1Y
47.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JGRO

1D
1.02%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
-8.00%
6M
-8.96%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMTM vs. JGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMTM
AMTM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
AMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

JGRO
JGRO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMTM vs. JGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amentum Holdings Inc (AMTM) and JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMTMJGRODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

0.71

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

1.15

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.16

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

0.97

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.89

3.00

+0.89

AMTM vs. JGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMTM Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the JGRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMTM and JGRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMTMJGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.71

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.82

-0.94

Correlation

The correlation between AMTM and JGRO is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AMTM vs. JGRO - Dividend Comparison

AMTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.


TTM2025202420232022
AMTM
Amentum Holdings Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JGRO
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF
0.17%0.16%0.10%0.17%0.16%

Drawdowns

AMTM vs. JGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMTM drawdown since its inception was -50.81%, which is greater than JGRO's maximum drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMTM and JGRO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMTMJGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.81%

-22.70%

-28.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.93%

-16.44%

-16.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.82%

-12.49%

-17.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.76%

-4.90%

-21.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.50%

5.30%

+6.20%

Volatility

AMTM vs. JGRO - Volatility Comparison

Amentum Holdings Inc (AMTM) has a higher volatility of 8.81% compared to JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) at 6.70%. This indicates that AMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMTMJGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.81%

6.70%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.62%

12.59%

+24.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.51%

21.47%

+28.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.65%

20.12%

+40.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.65%

20.12%

+40.53%