AMTM vs. GLW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AMTM (Amentum Holdings Inc) and GLW (Corning Incorporated) are both stocks. AMTM operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while GLW operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past year, AMTM returned 20.91% vs 304.86% for GLW. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AMTM vs. GLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amentum Holdings Inc (AMTM) and Corning Incorporated (GLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMTM achieves a -19.45% return, which is significantly lower than GLW's 129.65% return.

AMTM

• 1D: -2.95%
• 1M: -8.93%
• YTD: -19.45%
• 6M: -18.66%
• 1Y: 20.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLW

• 1D: 13.41%
• 1M: 26.82%
• YTD: 129.65%
• 6M: 140.21%
• 1Y: 304.86%
• 3Y*: 89.61%
• 5Y*: 39.49%
• 10Y*: 28.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMTM vs. GLW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMTM Amentum Holdings Inc	-19.45%	37.90%	-28.74%
GLW Corning Incorporated	129.65%	87.76%	5.55%

Correlation

The correlation between AMTM and GLW is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap AMTM : $5.72B GLW : $172.90B
EPS AMTM : $0.97 GLW : $2.10
PE Ratio AMTM : 24.15 GLW : 95.46
PS Ratio AMTM : 0.40 GLW : 10.59
PB Ratio AMTM : 1.24 GLW : 14.64
Total Revenue (TTM) AMTM : $14.20B GLW : $16.32B
Gross Profit (TTM) AMTM : $1.46B GLW : $5.93B
EBITDA (TTM) AMTM : $482.00M GLW : $3.77B

Return for Risk

AMTM vs. GLW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMTM

AMTM Risk / Return Rank: 52
AMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
AMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
AMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
AMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
AMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 49

GLW

GLW Risk / Return Rank: 98
GLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
GLW Omega Ratio Rank: 97
GLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
GLW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMTM vs. GLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amentum Holdings Inc (AMTM) and Corning Incorporated (GLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMTM	GLW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	5.67	-5.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	4.98	-3.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.71	-0.58
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.33	13.41	-13.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.75	45.12	-44.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMTM vs. GLW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMTM Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the GLW Sharpe Ratio of 5.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMTM and GLW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMTM	GLW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46	5.67	-5.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.22	0.26	-0.49

Drawdowns

AMTM vs. GLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMTM drawdown since its inception was -50.81%, smaller than the maximum GLW drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMTM and GLW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMTM	GLW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.81%	-99.02%	+48.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.05%	-23.01%	-17.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.57%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.76%	-3.64%	-34.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.35%	-50.53%	+23.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.53%	6.84%	+10.69%

Volatility

AMTM vs. GLW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amentum Holdings Inc (AMTM) is 11.66%, while Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a volatility of 25.41%. This indicates that AMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMTM	GLW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.66%	25.41%	-13.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.12%	48.30%	-20.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.78%	54.17%	-8.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.70%	35.19%	+23.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.70%	33.55%	+25.15%

Dividends

AMTM vs. GLW - Dividend Comparison

AMTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMTM Amentum Holdings Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GLW Corning Incorporated	0.56%	1.28%	2.36%	3.68%	3.38%	2.58%	2.44%	2.75%	2.38%	1.94%	2.22%	2.63%

Financials

AMTM vs. GLW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amentum Holdings Inc and Corning Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AMTM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amentum Holdings Inc reported a gross profit of 345.00M and revenue of 3.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.9%.

GLW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

AMTM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amentum Holdings Inc reported an operating income of 151.00M and revenue of 3.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

GLW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported an operating income of 639.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.

AMTM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amentum Holdings Inc reported a net income of 142.00M and revenue of 3.48B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.

GLW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a net income of 371.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMTM and GLW in my portfolio?

AMTM and GLW have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMTM or GLW?

GLW has higher volatility (25.41%) compared to AMTM (11.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMTM dropped -50.81% vs GLW's -99.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.67 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.