AMSC vs. VRT
AMSC (American Superconductor Corporation) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — AMSC in Specialty Industrial Machinery, VRT in Electrical Equipment & Parts. Over the past 5 years, AMSC returned 22.07%/yr vs 62.98%/yr for VRT. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMSC vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMSC achieves a 50.59% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 85.57% return.
AMSC
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -21.47%
- YTD
- 50.59%
- 6M
- 33.52%
- 1Y
- 37.67%
- 3Y*
- 91.72%
- 5Y*
- 22.07%
- 10Y*
- 17.27%
VRT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -11.59%
- YTD
- 85.57%
- 6M
- 61.97%
- 1Y
- 160.87%
- 3Y*
- 142.34%
- 5Y*
- 62.98%
- 10Y*
- —
AMSC vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 50.59% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 202.72% | -66.18% | -53.54% | 198.34% | -29.60% | 119.92% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 85.57% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMSC and VRT is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2018 | 0.37 |
The correlation between AMSC and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AMSC:
$2.03B
VRT:
$117.86B
AMSC:
$3.05
VRT:
$3.99
AMSC:
14.22
VRT:
75.41
AMSC:
0.03
VRT:
0.33
AMSC:
6.36
VRT:
10.84
AMSC:
3.65
VRT:
27.77
AMSC:
$299.15M
VRT:
$10.84B
AMSC:
$91.38M
VRT:
$3.92B
AMSC:
$19.29M
VRT:
$2.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMSC vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
AMSC
VRT
AMSC vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMSC | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.41 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 6.53 | -5.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 18.20 | -17.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMSC | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 2.79 | -2.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 1.03 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 1.00 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
AMSC vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMSC drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMSC and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMSC | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -71.24% | -28.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.08% | -24.78% | -36.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.86% | -61.28% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.94% | -71.24% | -11.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.74% | -20.11% | -73.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.76% | -16.22% | -59.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.14% | 8.89% | +27.25% |
Volatility
AMSC vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a higher volatility of 21.83% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 16.60%. This indicates that AMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMSC | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.83% | 16.60% | +5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.09% | 45.55% | +7.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.36% | 58.11% | +27.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.23% | 61.81% | +25.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.09% | 54.61% | +24.48% |
Dividends
AMSC vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Financials
AMSC vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Superconductor Corporation and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMSC vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison
AMSC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 23.60M and revenue of 86.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
AMSC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -522.00K and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.6%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
AMSC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a net income of 4.53M and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMSC and VRT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMSC has higher volatility (21.83%) compared to VRT (16.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMSC dropped -99.57% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMSC and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer