AMOM vs. HYLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and HYLD (High Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while HYLD is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for HYLD.

Performance

AMOM vs. HYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and High Yield ETF (HYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AMOM

• 1D: -4.33%
• 1M: 5.97%
• YTD: 26.78%
• 6M: 24.27%
• 1Y: 40.35%
• 3Y*: 26.54%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: —

HYLD

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMOM vs. HYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	26.78%	7.69%	35.79%	27.06%	-26.29%	13.08%	53.81%	9.64%
HYLD High Yield ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.80%	-11.48%	5.41%	3.11%	0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between AMOM and HYLD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019	0.20

The correlation between AMOM and HYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (3 years) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AMOM vs. HYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMOM

AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 55
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 49
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

HYLD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMOM vs. HYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and High Yield ETF (HYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMOM	HYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.70	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AMOM	HYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.33%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.75%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMOM	HYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.29%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.26%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.22%	—	—

AMOM vs. HYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HYLD's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMOM vs. HYLD - Dividend Comparison

AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while HYLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	0.07%	0.09%	0.00%	0.47%	0.72%	0.74%	24.31%	5.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HYLD High Yield ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.67%	7.86%	6.45%	7.52%	7.46%	7.97%	7.18%	6.59%	10.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMOM and HYLD in my portfolio?

AMOM and HYLD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMOM or HYLD?

On fees, AMOM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMOM or HYLD?

AMOM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for HYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMOM or HYLD?

AMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for HYLD.

What is the main difference between AMOM and HYLD?

AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while HYLD is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 1.29% for HYLD.