PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMLP vs. SDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMLP vs. SDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 16.62% return, which is significantly higher than SDOG's 15.26% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has underperformed SDOG with an annualized return of 6.79%, while SDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.69% annualized return.


AMLP

1D
1.03%
1M
0.25%
YTD
16.62%
6M
16.20%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
17.03%
10Y*
6.79%

SDOG

1D
1.19%
1M
3.62%
YTD
15.26%
6M
17.58%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMLP vs. SDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
16.62%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
15.26%11.12%14.70%4.19%-0.20%24.59%-0.35%24.02%-11.43%12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AMLP and SDOG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between AMLP and SDOG has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AMLP vs. SDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMLP
SDOG

Energy

97.7%
9.9%

Utilities

2.3%
9.4%

Basic Materials

-

4.1%

Communication Services

-

9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

15.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.8%

Financial Services

-

11.0%

Healthcare

-

9.7%

Industrials

-

8.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

14.1%

Energy

AMLP
97.7%
SDOG
9.9%

Utilities

AMLP
2.3%
SDOG
9.4%

Basic Materials

AMLP

-

SDOG
4.1%

Communication Services

AMLP

-

SDOG
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

AMLP

-

SDOG
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

AMLP

-

SDOG
9.8%

Financial Services

AMLP

-

SDOG
11.0%

Healthcare

AMLP

-

SDOG
9.7%

Industrials

AMLP

-

SDOG
8.0%

Real Estate

AMLP

-

SDOG

-

Technology

AMLP

-

SDOG
14.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMLP vs. SDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

SDOG
SDOG Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMLP vs. SDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMLPSDOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

2.34

-0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.25

3.50

-1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.41

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

4.28

-2.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.36

13.78

-6.43

AMLP vs. SDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the SDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMLP and SDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMLPSDOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.34

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.57

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.51

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.66

-0.43

Drawdowns

AMLP vs. SDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than SDOG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and SDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMLPSDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.19%

-43.56%

-33.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-6.24%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

-16.00%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-19.84%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.62%

-43.56%

-29.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

0.00%

-3.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.40%

-4.92%

-12.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

1.94%

+0.73%

Volatility

AMLP vs. SDOG - Volatility Comparison

Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) at 3.00%. This indicates that AMLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMLPSDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

3.00%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

7.89%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

11.37%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.98%

15.42%

+4.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.68%

19.06%

+8.62%

AMLP vs. SDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SDOG's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMLP vs. SDOG - Dividend Comparison

AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, more than SDOG's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.62%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.32%3.68%3.86%4.29%3.87%3.62%3.63%3.37%4.03%3.27%3.32%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMLP and SDOG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMLP has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to SDOG (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs SDOG's -43.56%.

On 10-year performance, SDOG leads with 9.69% vs 6.79% for AMLP. On fees, SDOG is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, SDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 6.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDOG is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.

AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.62%, compared with 3.32% for SDOG.

AMLP is categorized as MLPs, while SDOG is Large Cap Value Equities. AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AMLP and 0.36% for SDOG.

SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMLP and SDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer