PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMLP vs. BSMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMLP vs. BSMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 16.31% return, which is significantly higher than BSMV's 0.68% return.


AMLP

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
16.31%
6M
14.89%
1Y
17.06%
3Y*
20.15%
5Y*
16.90%
10Y*
6.76%

BSMV

1D
0.04%
1M
0.40%
YTD
0.68%
6M
0.96%
1Y
5.82%
3Y*
3.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMLP vs. BSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
16.31%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%6.33%
BSMV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF
0.68%4.03%-0.28%6.99%-15.32%0.66%

Correlation

The correlation between AMLP and BSMV is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021

0.00

The correlation between AMLP and BSMV shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.00 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AMLP vs. BSMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMLP
BSMV

Energy

97.7%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

AMLP
97.7%
BSMV

-

Utilities

AMLP
2.3%
BSMV

-

Basic Materials

AMLP

-

BSMV

-

Communication Services

AMLP

-

BSMV

-

Consumer Cyclical

AMLP

-

BSMV
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

AMLP

-

BSMV

-

Financial Services

AMLP

-

BSMV
3.5%

Healthcare

AMLP

-

BSMV

-

Industrials

AMLP

-

BSMV

-

Real Estate

AMLP

-

BSMV

-

Technology

AMLP

-

BSMV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMLP vs. BSMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

BSMV
BSMV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMLP vs. BSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMLPBSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.48

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.09

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.37

6.48

-0.11

AMLP vs. BSMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the BSMV Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMLP and BSMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMLPBSMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

2.32

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

-0.19

+0.41

Drawdowns

AMLP vs. BSMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than BSMV's maximum drawdown of -20.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and BSMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMLPBSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.19%

-20.68%

-56.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-2.79%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

-6.63%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.10%

-5.43%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.40%

-10.44%

-6.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

0.90%

+1.78%

Volatility

AMLP vs. BSMV - Volatility Comparison

Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV) at 0.82%. This indicates that AMLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMLPBSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

0.82%

+4.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

1.79%

+6.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

2.51%

+9.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.98%

5.69%

+14.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.68%

5.69%

+21.99%

AMLP vs. BSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMV's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMLP vs. BSMV - Dividend Comparison

AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, more than BSMV's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.64%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
BSMV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF
2.90%2.93%3.10%2.59%2.21%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMLP and BSMV have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMLP has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to BSMV (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs BSMV's -20.68%.

On 3-year performance, AMLP leads with 20.15% vs 3.08% for BSMV. On fees, BSMV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMV has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AMLP has performed better with a 20.15% return vs 3.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSMV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.

AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.64%, compared with 2.90% for BSMV.

AMLP is categorized as MLPs, while BSMV is Municipal Bonds. AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while BSMV tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2031 Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AMLP and 0.18% for BSMV.

BSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMLP and BSMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer