AMJB vs. OIH
Compare and contrast key facts about Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH).
AMJB and OIH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMJB is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2024. OIH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both AMJB and OIH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AMJB vs. OIH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMJB vs. OIH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN | 17.28% | 7.91% | 17.90% |
OIH VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF | 41.94% | 6.81% | -9.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMJB achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly lower than OIH's 41.94% return.
AMJB
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 20.78%
- 1Y
- 13.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OIH
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 41.94%
- 6M
- 58.22%
- 1Y
- 56.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.38%
- 5Y*
- 17.15%
- 10Y*
- -0.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMJB vs. OIH - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMJB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than OIH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AMJB vs. OIH — Risk / Return Rank
AMJB
OIH
AMJB vs. OIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMJB | OIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 1.50 | -0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 1.99 | -1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.29 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 2.19 | -1.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 6.08 | -4.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMJB | OIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 1.50 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | -0.00 | +1.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMJB and OIH is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AMJB vs. OIH - Dividend Comparison
AMJB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than OIH's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN | 5.71% | 6.52% | 5.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OIH VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF | 1.20% | 1.71% | 2.01% | 1.36% | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.23% | 2.10% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.40% | 2.39% |
Drawdowns
AMJB vs. OIH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMJB drawdown since its inception was -16.98%, smaller than the maximum OIH drawdown of -94.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMJB and OIH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMJB | OIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.98% | -94.45% | +77.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.98% | -26.13% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.00% | -64.00% | +61.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -48.75% | +45.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.38% | 9.43% | -3.05% |
Volatility
AMJB vs. OIH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) is 3.70%, while VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) has a volatility of 8.77%. This indicates that AMJB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMJB | OIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 8.77% | -5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 21.77% | -11.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.11% | 38.02% | -17.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 37.49% | -19.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 42.50% | -24.76% |