AMJB vs. MFSM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMJB (Alerian MLP Index ETN) and MFSM (MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMJB is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index, while MFSM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by MFS. AMJB is passively managed, while MFSM is actively managed. Over the past year, AMJB returned 15.68% vs 7.57% for MFSM. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. AMJB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for MFSM.

Performance

AMJB vs. MFSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF (MFSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMJB achieves a 17.69% return, which is significantly higher than MFSM's 1.73% return.

AMJB

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: -1.98%
• YTD: 17.69%
• 6M: 15.52%
• 1Y: 15.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFSM

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 2.29%
• 1Y: 7.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMJB vs. MFSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN	17.69%	1.36%	-4.50%
MFSM MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF	1.73%	5.25%	-1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between AMJB and MFSM is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024	-0.10

The correlation between AMJB and MFSM shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to -0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AMJB vs. MFSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMJB

AMJB Risk / Return Rank: 30
AMJB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
AMJB Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
AMJB Omega Ratio Rank: 26
AMJB Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
AMJB Martin Ratio Rank: 32

MFSM

MFSM Risk / Return Rank: 78
MFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
MFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMJB vs. MFSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF (MFSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMJB	MFSM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	2.85	-1.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	4.36	-2.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.62	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	2.87	-1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.73	10.63	-5.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMJB vs. MFSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMJB Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the MFSM Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMJB and MFSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMJB	MFSM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	2.85	-1.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	1.11	-0.41

Drawdowns

AMJB vs. MFSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMJB drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, which is greater than MFSM's maximum drawdown of -3.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMJB and MFSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMJB	MFSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.70%	-3.86%	-13.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.90%	-2.65%	-7.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.06%	-0.52%	-5.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-0.88%	-4.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	0.71%	+2.63%

Volatility

AMJB vs. MFSM - Volatility Comparison

Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF (MFSM) at 0.92%. This indicates that AMJB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMJB	MFSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.66%	0.92%	+4.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.18%	1.96%	+10.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.37%	2.67%	+12.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.19%	3.44%	+14.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.19%	3.44%	+14.75%

AMJB vs. MFSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMJB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MFSM's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMJB vs. MFSM - Dividend Comparison

AMJB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MFSM MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF	3.55%	3.53%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMJB and MFSM in my portfolio?

AMJB and MFSM have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMJB or MFSM?

AMJB has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to MFSM (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMJB dropped -17.70% vs MFSM's -3.86%.

Which ETF is better, AMJB or MFSM?

On 1-year performance, AMJB leads with 15.68% vs 7.57% for MFSM. On fees, MFSM is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, MFSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMJB or MFSM?

Over the 1-year period, AMJB has performed better with a 15.68% return vs 7.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMJB or MFSM?

MFSM is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for AMJB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMJB or MFSM?

MFSM has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.00% for AMJB.

What is the main difference between AMJB and MFSM?

AMJB is categorized as Energy Equities, while MFSM is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and MFS. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for AMJB and 0.34% for MFSM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MFSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.