PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFSM vs. MFSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFSM vs. MFSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF (MFSM) and MFS Active International ETF (MFSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFSM achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly lower than MFSI's 7.98% return.


MFSM

1D
0.11%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.76%
6M
2.32%
1Y
7.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MFSI

1D
0.83%
1M
5.05%
YTD
7.98%
6M
10.73%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFSM vs. MFSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MFSM
MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF
1.76%5.25%-1.30%
MFSI
MFS Active International ETF
7.98%26.43%-4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MFSM and MFSI is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFSM vs. MFSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFSM
MFSM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
MFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MFSI
MFSI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFSM vs. MFSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF (MFSM) and MFS Active International ETF (MFSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFSMMFSIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.84

1.29

+1.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.35

1.86

+2.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.23

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

1.79

+1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.40

6.71

+3.69

MFSM vs. MFSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the MFSI Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFSM and MFSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFSMMFSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

1.29

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

1.23

-0.11

Drawdowns

MFSM vs. MFSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFSM drawdown since its inception was -3.86%, smaller than the maximum MFSI drawdown of -13.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSM and MFSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFSMMFSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-13.67%

+9.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.65%

-11.17%

+8.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

0.00%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-1.97%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

2.98%

-2.27%

Volatility

MFSM vs. MFSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF (MFSM) is 0.93%, while MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that MFSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFSMMFSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

4.72%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.97%

12.11%

-10.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67%

14.60%

-11.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.45%

16.31%

-12.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.45%

16.31%

-12.86%

MFSM vs. MFSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFSM has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than MFSI's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFSM vs. MFSI - Dividend Comparison

MFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than MFSI's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MFSI
MFS Active International ETF
0.75%0.81%0.00%
MFSM
MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF
3.55%3.53%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFSM and MFSI have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFSI has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to MFSM (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFSM dropped -3.86% vs MFSI's -13.67%.

On 1-year performance, MFSI leads with 18.65% vs 7.56% for MFSM. On fees, MFSM is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, MFSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MFSI has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 7.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MFSM is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MFSI.

MFSM has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.75% for MFSI.

MFSM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while MFSI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for MFSM and 0.59% for MFSI.

MFSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFSM and MFSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer