PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMINX vs. GDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMINX vs. GDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) and The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust (GDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMINX achieves a 11.84% return, which is significantly higher than GDV's 7.28% return. Over the past 10 years, AMINX has outperformed GDV with an annualized return of 12.47%, while GDV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.95% annualized return.


AMINX

1D
1.12%
1M
6.61%
YTD
11.84%
6M
11.32%
1Y
24.08%
3Y*
16.54%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
12.47%

GDV

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.10%
YTD
7.28%
6M
9.81%
1Y
24.13%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
10.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMINX vs. GDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMINX
Amana Income Fund Institutional Class
11.84%16.69%13.13%13.87%-8.65%22.81%14.18%25.59%-4.94%21.95%
GDV
The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust
7.28%22.83%18.14%11.93%-18.61%32.83%4.89%27.73%-17.13%24.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AMINX and GDV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.74

The correlation between AMINX and GDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMINX vs. GDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMINX
AMINX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AMINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMINX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
AMINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMINX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

GDV
GDV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDV Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMINX vs. GDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) and The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust (GDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMINXGDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

2.09

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

2.89

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.38

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

2.49

-0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.99

10.72

-1.73

AMINX vs. GDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the GDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMINX and GDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMINXGDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.09

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.50

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.51

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.38

+0.34

Drawdowns

AMINX vs. GDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMINX drawdown since its inception was -31.45%, smaller than the maximum GDV drawdown of -68.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMINX and GDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMINXGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.45%

-68.88%

+37.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-9.75%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.34%

-16.07%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-28.33%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.45%

-53.09%

+21.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.09%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-9.30%

+5.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.26%

+0.52%

Volatility

AMINX vs. GDV - Volatility Comparison

Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust (GDV) at 2.34%. This indicates that AMINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMINXGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

2.34%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

8.66%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

11.61%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

16.87%

-2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

21.65%

-5.70%

AMINX vs. GDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMINX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than GDV's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMINX vs. GDV - Dividend Comparison

AMINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, less than GDV's 5.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMINX
Amana Income Fund Institutional Class
5.21%5.80%6.06%5.61%8.61%5.02%6.91%8.22%6.87%6.04%4.58%7.18%
GDV
The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust
5.96%6.05%5.47%6.10%6.84%5.11%6.15%6.01%7.21%5.64%6.59%6.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMINX and GDV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMINX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to GDV (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMINX dropped -31.45% vs GDV's -68.88%.

GDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMINX and GDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer