AMEL.DE vs. XDWT.DE
AMEL.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR) and XDWT.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - AMEL.DE is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while XDWT.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMEL.DE returned 7.43%/yr vs 24.00%/yr for XDWT.DE. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMEL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWT.DE.
Performance
AMEL.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEL.DE achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than XDWT.DE's 25.23% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEL.DE has underperformed XDWT.DE with an annualized return of 7.43%, while XDWT.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 24.00% annualized return.
AMEL.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -7.22%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 34.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.43%
XDWT.DE
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- 14.75%
- YTD
- 25.23%
- 6M
- 23.98%
- 1Y
- 48.86%
- 3Y*
- 29.29%
- 5Y*
- 22.52%
- 10Y*
- 24.00%
AMEL.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR | 10.83% | 38.06% | -22.22% | 28.09% | 16.34% | -3.21% | -21.29% | 20.69% | -3.27% | 8.15% |
XDWT.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C | 25.23% | 9.56% | 41.11% | 50.00% | -28.10% | 41.76% | 30.98% | 51.77% | 0.78% | 21.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEL.DE and XDWT.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEL.DE vs. XDWT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEL.DE
XDWT.DE
AMEL.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEL.DE | XDWT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.38 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 3.12 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.66 | 8.24 | +1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEL.DE | XDWT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 2.38 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.99 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 1.11 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 1.09 | -0.97 |
Drawdowns
AMEL.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEL.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.69%, which is greater than XDWT.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEL.DE and XDWT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEL.DE | XDWT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.69% | -31.61% | -21.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.86% | -15.59% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.38% | -29.46% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.38% | -29.46% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.31% | -31.61% | -19.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.86% | -2.61% | -8.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.89% | -5.82% | -12.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 5.91% | -2.34% |
Volatility
AMEL.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) is 5.32%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that AMEL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEL.DE | XDWT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 7.11% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.30% | 14.96% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.10% | 20.39% | -2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 22.55% | -1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.27% | 21.46% | +3.81% |
AMEL.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWT.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMEL.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEL.DE nor XDWT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEL.DE and XDWT.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWT.DE.
AMEL.DE is categorized as Latin America Equities, while XDWT.DE is Technology Equities. AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while XDWT.DE tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEL.DE and 0.25% for XDWT.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEL.DE and XDWT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer