AMEL.DE vs. LOGS.DE
AMEL.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR) and LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - AMEL.DE is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while LOGS.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMEL.DE returned 7.43%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for LOGS.DE. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMEL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LOGS.DE.
Performance
AMEL.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEL.DE achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than LOGS.DE's 31.31% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEL.DE has underperformed LOGS.DE with an annualized return of 7.43%, while LOGS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.
AMEL.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -7.22%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 34.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.43%
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 31.31%
- 6M
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
AMEL.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR | 10.83% | 38.06% | -22.22% | 28.09% | 16.34% | -3.21% | -21.29% | 20.69% | -3.27% | 8.15% |
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.31% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 21.06% | -21.75% | 4.34% | 5.49% | 2.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEL.DE and LOGS.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2011 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AMEL.DE and LOGS.DE has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEL.DE vs. LOGS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEL.DE
LOGS.DE
AMEL.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEL.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.62 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 9.83 | -6.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.66 | 34.29 | -24.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEL.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 3.73 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.98 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.51 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.24 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
AMEL.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEL.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.69%, smaller than the maximum LOGS.DE drawdown of -56.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEL.DE and LOGS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEL.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.69% | -56.42% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.86% | -6.50% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.38% | -21.16% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.38% | -21.16% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.31% | -56.42% | +5.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.86% | -4.69% | -6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.89% | -15.22% | -2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 1.87% | +1.70% |
Volatility
AMEL.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) is 5.32%, while Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that AMEL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOGS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEL.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 6.06% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.30% | 13.34% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.10% | 17.18% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 21.72% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.27% | 24.09% | +1.18% |
AMEL.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LOGS.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMEL.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEL.DE nor LOGS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEL.DE and LOGS.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LOGS.DE.
AMEL.DE is categorized as Latin America Equities, while LOGS.DE is Energy Equities. AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEL.DE and 0.30% for LOGS.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEL.DE and LOGS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer