PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMEL.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMEL.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMEL.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMEL.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR
18.02%38.06%-22.22%28.09%16.34%-3.21%-21.29%20.69%-3.27%8.15%
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
-4.21%7.08%33.77%51.54%-29.96%39.62%34.72%42.90%3.22%15.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMEL.DE achieves a 18.02% return, which is significantly higher than 6AQQ.DE's -4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEL.DE has underperformed 6AQQ.DE with an annualized return of 8.03%, while 6AQQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 18.71% annualized return.


AMEL.DE

1D
2.32%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
18.02%
6M
28.91%
1Y
47.07%
3Y*
16.42%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
8.03%

6AQQ.DE

1D
2.55%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
-4.21%
6M
-1.21%
1Y
16.23%
3Y*
20.53%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
18.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMEL.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMEL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

AMEL.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMEL.DE
AMEL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMEL.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMEL.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

0.79

+1.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

1.20

+1.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.17

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

1.60

+2.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.90

4.68

+10.23

AMEL.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMEL.DE and 6AQQ.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMEL.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

0.79

+1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.67

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.95

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

1.00

-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between AMEL.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AMEL.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMEL.DE nor 6AQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AMEL.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMEL.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.69%, which is greater than 6AQQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEL.DE and 6AQQ.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMEL.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.69%

-31.19%

-21.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-13.37%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.38%

-31.19%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.31%

-31.19%

-20.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-7.58%

+5.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.04%

-5.40%

-12.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.42%

-0.17%

Volatility

AMEL.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.85% compared to Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) at 5.00%. This indicates that AMEL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMEL.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.85%

5.00%

+2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

11.81%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.20%

20.66%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.82%

19.84%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.40%

19.65%

+5.75%