AMEL.DE vs. COPM.AS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AMEL.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR) and COPM.AS (iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMEL.DE is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while COPM.AS is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Copper Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AMEL.DE returned 34.54% vs 100.74% for COPM.AS. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMEL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for COPM.AS.

Performance

AMEL.DE vs. COPM.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AMEL.DE is traded in EUR, while COPM.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COPM.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMEL.DE achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than COPM.AS's 27.42% return.

AMEL.DE

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: -7.22%
• YTD: 10.83%
• 6M: 8.65%
• 1Y: 34.54%
• 3Y*: 10.77%
• 5Y*: 9.48%
• 10Y*: 7.43%

COPM.AS

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: 13.76%
• YTD: 27.42%
• 6M: 36.96%
• 1Y: 100.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMEL.DE vs. COPM.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR	10.83%	38.06%	-22.22%	9.90%
COPM.AS iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF	27.42%	60.55%	7.08%	3.46%

Correlation

The correlation between AMEL.DE and COPM.AS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023	0.50

The correlation between AMEL.DE and COPM.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMEL.DE vs. COPM.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMEL.DE

AMEL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 57
AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
AMEL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
AMEL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
AMEL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AMEL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

COPM.AS

COPM.AS Risk / Return Rank: 77
COPM.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
COPM.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
COPM.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 69
COPM.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
COPM.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMEL.DE vs. COPM.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMEL.DE	COPM.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	2.76	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	3.39	-0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.41	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	4.22	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.66	15.77	-6.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMEL.DE vs. COPM.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the COPM.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMEL.DE and COPM.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMEL.DE	COPM.AS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	2.76	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	1.06	-0.94

Drawdowns

AMEL.DE vs. COPM.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMEL.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.69%, which is greater than COPM.AS's maximum drawdown of -37.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEL.DE and COPM.AS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMEL.DE	COPM.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.69%	-37.66%	-15.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.86%	-23.49%	+12.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.86%	-3.68%	-7.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.89%	-11.67%	-6.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.57%	6.30%	-2.73%

Volatility

AMEL.DE vs. COPM.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) is 5.32%, while iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS) has a volatility of 13.36%. This indicates that AMEL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPM.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMEL.DE	COPM.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	13.36%	-8.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.30%	30.72%	-15.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.10%	35.93%	-17.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.90%	32.89%	-11.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.27%	32.89%	-7.62%

AMEL.DE vs. COPM.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMEL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than COPM.AS's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMEL.DE vs. COPM.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMEL.DE nor COPM.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMEL.DE and COPM.AS in my portfolio?

AMEL.DE and COPM.AS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMEL.DE or COPM.AS?

On fees, AMEL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMEL.DE or COPM.AS?

AMEL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for COPM.AS.

What is the main difference between AMEL.DE and COPM.AS?

AMEL.DE is categorized as Latin America Equities, while COPM.AS is Commodity Producers Equities. AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while COPM.AS tracks STOXX Global Copper Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEL.DE and 0.55% for COPM.AS.