6AQQ.DE vs. XLK
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK).
6AQQ.DE and XLK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 6AQQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both 6AQQ.DE and XLK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 6AQQ.DE or XLK.
Key characteristics
| 6AQQ.DE | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.89% | 10.23% |
| 1Y Return | 34.35% | 35.54% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 16.38% | 17.54% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 20.72% | 24.21% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 22.16% | 20.79% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.28 | 2.13 |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.00% | 17.96% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.19% | -82.05% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.49% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and XLK is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
6AQQ.DE vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 6AQQ.DE achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 10.23% return. Over the past 10 years, 6AQQ.DE has outperformed XLK with an annualized return of 22.16%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively lower 20.79% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
6AQQ.DE vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
6AQQ.DE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
6AQQ.DE vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
6AQQ.DE vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
6AQQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.70% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% | 1.75% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
6AQQ.DE vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 6AQQ.DE and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
6AQQ.DE vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) have volatilities of 5.34% and 5.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.