AMED.DE vs. H4ZA.DE
AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) and H4ZA.DE (HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR) are both Europe Equities funds - AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped while H4ZA.DE tracks the EURO STOXX® 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMED.DE returned 9.75%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for H4ZA.DE. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMED.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for H4ZA.DE.
Performance
AMED.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMED.DE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than H4ZA.DE's 7.24% return. Over the past 10 years, AMED.DE has underperformed H4ZA.DE with an annualized return of 9.75%, while H4ZA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
H4ZA.DE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
AMED.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
H4ZA.DE HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR | 7.24% | 22.26% | 13.81% | 22.59% | -8.87% | 23.72% | -2.73% | 30.07% | -11.96% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMED.DE and H4ZA.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2010 | 0.95 |
The correlation between AMED.DE and H4ZA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMED.DE vs. H4ZA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMED.DE
H4ZA.DE
AMED.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMED.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.18 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 1.43 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.40 | 4.85 | +4.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMED.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 0.98 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.69 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.59 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.41 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
AMED.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMED.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, roughly equal to the maximum H4ZA.DE drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMED.DE and H4ZA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMED.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -38.41% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -10.97% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -16.40% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.06% | -23.26% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.35% | -38.41% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.50% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -7.84% | +1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 3.24% | -0.43% |
Volatility
AMED.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) at 4.95%. This indicates that AMED.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than H4ZA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMED.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 4.95% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 12.99% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 15.99% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 17.50% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 18.17% | -1.17% |
AMED.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMED.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZA.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMED.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Dividend Comparison
AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H4ZA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
H4ZA.DE HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR | 2.44% | 2.49% | 5.35% | 2.93% | 2.94% | 1.94% | 2.06% | 2.84% | 3.55% | 2.73% | 2.85% | 2.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, AMED.DE and H4ZA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, H4ZA.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H4ZA.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while H4ZA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMED.DE and 0.05% for H4ZA.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMED.DE and H4ZA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer