AMEA.DE vs. XNKY.DE
AMEA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR) and XNKY.DE (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMEA.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while XNKY.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Nikkei 225®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMEA.DE returned 7.81%/yr vs 11.97%/yr for XNKY.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMEA.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XNKY.DE.
Performance
AMEA.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEA.DE achieves a 23.16% return, which is significantly lower than XNKY.DE's 27.05% return.
AMEA.DE
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -9.94%
- 6M
- 15.40%
- YTD
- 23.16%
- 1Y
- 37.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
XNKY.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -10.65%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- YTD
- 27.05%
- 1Y
- 53.58%
- 3Y*
- 20.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.97%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.65%
AMEA.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 23.16% | 18.02% | 18.95% | 3.13% | -15.22% | 1.46% | 4.28% |
XNKY.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF | 27.05% | 16.16% | 14.34% | 18.03% | -15.35% | 3.16% | 7.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEA.DE and XNKY.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between AMEA.DE and XNKY.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (5 years) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEA.DE vs. XNKY.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEA.DE
XNKY.DE
AMEA.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMEA.DE | XNKY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 4.14 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.19 | 11.57 | -2.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMEA.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, which is greater than XNKY.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEA.DE and XNKY.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEA.DE | XNKY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -21.47% | -13.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.20% | -12.99% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.46% | -20.16% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.47% | -21.15% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.86% | -12.06% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -7.80% | -2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 4.64% | -0.57% |
Volatility
AMEA.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) at 9.38%. This indicates that AMEA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNKY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEA.DE | XNKY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.01% | 9.38% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.59% | 21.06% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.25% | 25.99% | -3.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 19.18% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 18.83% | +0.37% |
AMEA.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XNKY.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMEA.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEA.DE nor XNKY.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEA.DE and XNKY.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNKY.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNKY.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AMEA.DE.
AMEA.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XNKY.DE is Japan Equities. AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEA.DE and 0.09% for XNKY.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEA.DE and XNKY.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer