AMEA.DE vs. CEBL.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) and iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE).
AMEA.DE and CEBL.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMEA.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. CEBL.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. It was launched on Aug 6, 2010. Both AMEA.DE and CEBL.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMEA.DE or CEBL.DE.
Key characteristics
| AMEA.DE | CEBL.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.01% | 18.39% |
| 1Y Return | 20.09% | 20.35% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.54% | -0.52% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.91% | 4.95% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.25% | 6.22% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.36 | 1.33 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.94 | 1.91 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.25 | 1.25 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.45 | 6.79 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.17% | 3.03% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.12% | 15.54% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.43% | -35.09% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.58% | -10.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEA.DE and CEBL.DE is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AMEA.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AMEA.DE having a 18.01% return and CEBL.DE slightly higher at 18.39%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AMEA.DE having a 6.25% annualized return and CEBL.DE not far behind at 6.22%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMEA.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMEA.DE and CEBL.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMEA.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) and iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMEA.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEA.DE nor CEBL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.69% | 1.86% |
Drawdowns
AMEA.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.43%, roughly equal to the maximum CEBL.DE drawdown of -35.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEA.DE and CEBL.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMEA.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) is 5.78%, while iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that AMEA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEBL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.