AMDY vs. XAPR
AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) and XAPR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMDY returned 240.44% vs 8.79% for XAPR. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMDY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for XAPR.
Performance
AMDY vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMDY achieves a 110.49% return, which is significantly higher than XAPR's 3.39% return.
AMDY
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- 46.76%
- YTD
- 110.49%
- 6M
- 111.80%
- 1Y
- 240.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAPR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 4.05%
- 1Y
- 8.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDY vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 110.49% | 53.93% | -9.73% |
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April | 3.39% | 12.57% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMDY and XAPR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMDY vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank
AMDY
XAPR
AMDY vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMDY | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 2.06 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.77 | 13.37 | -4.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.77 | 70.60 | -50.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMDY | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.53 | 4.31 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 1.88 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
AMDY vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMDY drawdown since its inception was -53.92%, which is greater than XAPR's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDY and XAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMDY | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.92% | -6.18% | -47.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.59% | -0.66% | -26.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.16% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.02% | -0.18% | -17.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.22% | 0.12% | +12.10% |
Volatility
AMDY vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a higher volatility of 20.81% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) at 0.75%. This indicates that AMDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMDY | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.81% | 0.75% | +20.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.99% | 1.31% | +38.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.40% | 2.05% | +51.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.01% | 6.18% | +39.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.01% | 6.18% | +39.83% |
AMDY vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMDY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMDY vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison
AMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.91%, while XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 54.91% | 80.68% | 109.98% | 6.68% |
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMDY and XAPR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMDY has higher volatility (20.81%) compared to XAPR (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDY dropped -53.92% vs XAPR's -6.18%.
On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 240.44% vs 8.79% for XAPR. On fees, XAPR is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 240.44% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAPR is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDY.
AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 54.91%, compared with 0.00% for XAPR.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMDY and 0.85% for XAPR.
AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.53 vs 4.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMDY and XAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer