PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDY vs. XAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDY vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDY achieves a 110.49% return, which is significantly higher than XAPR's 3.39% return.


AMDY

1D
3.39%
1M
46.76%
YTD
110.49%
6M
111.80%
1Y
240.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XAPR

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.66%
YTD
3.39%
6M
4.05%
1Y
8.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDY vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AMDY and XAPR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDY vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

XAPR
XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDY vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMDYXAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

2.06

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.77

13.37

-4.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.77

70.60

-50.83

AMDY vs. XAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDY Sharpe Ratio is 4.53, which is comparable to the XAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDY and XAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMDYXAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.53

4.31

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

1.88

-0.63

Drawdowns

AMDY vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDY drawdown since its inception was -53.92%, which is greater than XAPR's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDY and XAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDYXAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.92%

-6.18%

-47.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.59%

-0.66%

-26.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.16%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.02%

-0.18%

-17.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.22%

0.12%

+12.10%

Volatility

AMDY vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a higher volatility of 20.81% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) at 0.75%. This indicates that AMDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDYXAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.81%

0.75%

+20.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.99%

1.31%

+38.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.40%

2.05%

+51.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.01%

6.18%

+39.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.01%

6.18%

+39.83%

AMDY vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMDY vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison

AMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.91%, while XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
54.91%80.68%109.98%6.68%
XAPR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMDY and XAPR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDY has higher volatility (20.81%) compared to XAPR (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDY dropped -53.92% vs XAPR's -6.18%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 240.44% vs 8.79% for XAPR. On fees, XAPR is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 240.44% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XAPR is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDY.

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 54.91%, compared with 0.00% for XAPR.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMDY and 0.85% for XAPR.

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.53 vs 4.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDY and XAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer