PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDY vs. TBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDY vs. TBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDY achieves a 110.49% return, which is significantly higher than TBIL's 1.49% return.


AMDY

1D
3.39%
1M
46.76%
YTD
110.49%
6M
111.80%
1Y
240.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TBIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.78%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDY vs. TBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
110.49%53.93%-17.00%26.24%
TBIL
US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF
1.49%4.19%5.15%1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDY and TBIL is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023

-0.07

The correlation between AMDY and TBIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDY vs. TBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

TBIL
TBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDY vs. TBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMDYTBILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.53

13.78

-9.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.54

58.40

-53.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

17.16

-15.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.77

196.84

-188.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.77

934.41

-914.64

AMDY vs. TBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDY Sharpe Ratio is 4.53, which is lower than the TBIL Sharpe Ratio of 13.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDY and TBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMDYTBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.53

13.78

-9.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

14.07

-12.82

Drawdowns

AMDY vs. TBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDY drawdown since its inception was -53.92%, which is greater than TBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDY and TBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDYTBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.92%

-0.10%

-53.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.59%

-0.02%

-27.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.02%

-0.00%

-18.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.22%

0.00%

+12.22%

Volatility

AMDY vs. TBIL - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a higher volatility of 20.81% compared to US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) at 0.08%. This indicates that AMDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDYTBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.81%

0.08%

+20.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.99%

0.19%

+39.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.40%

0.29%

+53.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.01%

0.32%

+45.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.01%

0.32%

+45.69%

AMDY vs. TBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TBIL's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMDY vs. TBIL - Dividend Comparison

AMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.91%, more than TBIL's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
54.91%80.68%109.98%6.68%0.00%
TBIL
US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF
3.82%4.07%5.02%5.00%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMDY and TBIL have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDY has higher volatility (20.81%) compared to TBIL (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDY dropped -53.92% vs TBIL's -0.10%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 240.44% vs 3.93% for TBIL. On fees, TBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 240.44% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDY.

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 54.91%, compared with 3.82% for TBIL.

AMDY is categorized as Options Trading, while TBIL is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and US Benchmark Series. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMDY and 0.15% for TBIL.

TBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.78 vs 4.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDY and TBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer