AMDWX vs. MNZL
AMDWX (Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund) and MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) are both funds - AMDWX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Amana, while MNZL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMDWX charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MNZL.
Performance
AMDWX vs. MNZL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMDWX achieves a 24.50% return, which is significantly higher than MNZL's 15.56% return.
AMDWX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 24.50%
- 6M
- 23.94%
- 1Y
- 50.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.82%
- 10Y*
- 8.43%
MNZL
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 14.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDWX vs. MNZL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMDWX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund | 24.50% | 6.30% |
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 15.56% | 3.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMDWX and MNZL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMDWX vs. MNZL — Risk / Return Rank
AMDWX
MNZL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMDWX vs. MNZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund (AMDWX) and Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMDWX | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMDWX vs. MNZL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMDWX drawdown since its inception was -28.88%, which is greater than MNZL's maximum drawdown of -9.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDWX and MNZL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMDWX | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.88% | -9.66% | -19.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -3.25% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.99% | -1.84% | -7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | — | — |
Volatility
AMDWX vs. MNZL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMDWX | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.78% | 17.03% | +1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.49% | 17.03% | -2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 17.03% | -2.72% |
AMDWX vs. MNZL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMDWX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than MNZL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMDWX vs. MNZL - Dividend Comparison
AMDWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than MNZL's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDWX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund | 2.25% | 2.80% | 0.58% | 0.91% | 1.03% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.58% |
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMDWX and MNZL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AMDWX and MNZL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer