AMDWX vs. FXC.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund (AMDWX) and iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS).
AMDWX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Sep 27, 2009. FXC.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Oct 21, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMDWX or FXC.AS.
Key characteristics
AMDWX | FXC.AS | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 0.40% | 9.30% |
1Y Return | 9.58% | -2.90% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -2.05% | -12.63% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 5.64% | -7.33% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 2.20% | 2.37% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.91 | -0.09 |
Daily Std Dev | 10.66% | 25.85% |
Max Drawdown | -28.89% | -66.56% |
Current Drawdown | -8.16% | -43.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMDWX and FXC.AS is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AMDWX vs. FXC.AS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AMDWX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than FXC.AS's 9.30% return. Over the past 10 years, AMDWX has underperformed FXC.AS with an annualized return of 2.20%, while FXC.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 2.37% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMDWX vs. FXC.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMDWX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FXC.AS's 0.74% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMDWX vs. FXC.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund (AMDWX) and iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMDWX vs. FXC.AS - Dividend Comparison
AMDWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than FXC.AS's 2.45% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund | 0.91% | 0.91% | 1.03% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.58% | 0.20% | 0.39% |
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | 2.45% | 2.68% | 2.53% | 2.10% | 2.93% | 2.74% | 3.48% | 2.83% | 2.62% | 2.94% | 3.07% | 3.50% |
Drawdowns
AMDWX vs. FXC.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMDWX drawdown since its inception was -28.89%, smaller than the maximum FXC.AS drawdown of -66.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDWX and FXC.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMDWX vs. FXC.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amana Mutual Funds Trust Developing World Fund (AMDWX) is 3.42%, while iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (FXC.AS) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that AMDWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXC.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.