PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDW vs. PSTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDW vs. PSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF (PSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDW achieves a 176.01% return, which is significantly higher than PSTR's 7.21% return.


AMDW

1D
-7.20%
1M
12.58%
YTD
176.01%
6M
174.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PSTR

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.68%
YTD
7.21%
6M
6.96%
1Y
16.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDW vs. PSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
176.01%36.56%
PSTR
PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF
7.21%5.96%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDW and PSTR is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.50

AMDW vs. PSTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMDW
PSTR

Technology

27.8%
38.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Communication Services

-

9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.0%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

9.7%

Healthcare

-

11.5%

Industrials

-

7.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Technology

AMDW
27.8%
PSTR
38.4%

Basic Materials

AMDW

-

PSTR
1.6%

Communication Services

AMDW

-

PSTR
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

AMDW

-

PSTR
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

AMDW

-

PSTR
6.0%

Energy

AMDW

-

PSTR
3.5%

Financial Services

AMDW

-

PSTR
9.7%

Healthcare

AMDW

-

PSTR
11.5%

Industrials

AMDW

-

PSTR
7.3%

Real Estate

AMDW

-

PSTR
1.9%

Utilities

AMDW

-

PSTR
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDW vs. PSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PSTR
PSTR Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDW vs. PSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF (PSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMDWPSTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.58

AMDW vs. PSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMDW vs. PSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDW drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than PSTR's maximum drawdown of -14.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDW and PSTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDWPSTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-14.73%

-19.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.20%

-2.39%

-4.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.25%

-1.57%

-12.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

Volatility

AMDW vs. PSTR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDWPSTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.41%

8.95%

+74.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.41%

12.55%

+70.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.41%

12.55%

+70.86%

AMDW vs. PSTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than PSTR's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMDW vs. PSTR - Dividend Comparison

AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.14%, more than PSTR's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
37.14%34.78%0.00%
PSTR
PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF
4.94%4.96%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMDW and PSTR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for PSTR.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 37.14%, compared with 4.94% for PSTR.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and PeakShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMDW and 1.07% for PSTR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDW and PSTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer