AMDW vs. FTQI
AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) and FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. AMDW is actively managed, while FTQI is passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTQI.
Performance
AMDW vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMDW achieves a 176.52% return, which is significantly higher than FTQI's 10.11% return.
AMDW
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 176.52%
- 6M
- 174.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTQI
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 10.11%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 24.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 8.39%
AMDW vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 176.52% | 36.56% |
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 10.11% | 11.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMDW and FTQI is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.67 |
AMDW vs. FTQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMDW
FTQI
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
AMDW
FTQI
Basic Materials
AMDW
-
FTQI
Communication Services
AMDW
-
FTQI
Consumer Cyclical
AMDW
-
FTQI
Consumer Defensive
AMDW
-
FTQI
Energy
AMDW
-
FTQI
Financial Services
AMDW
-
FTQI
Healthcare
AMDW
-
FTQI
Industrials
AMDW
-
FTQI
Real Estate
AMDW
-
FTQI
Utilities
AMDW
-
FTQI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMDW vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank
AMDW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTQI
AMDW vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMDW | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 19.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMDW vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMDW drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than FTQI's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDW and FTQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMDW | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.64% | -19.42% | -15.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.03% | -1.45% | -5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.15% | -3.74% | -10.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.31% | — |
Volatility
AMDW vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMDW | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.01% | 10.63% | +72.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.01% | 14.82% | +68.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.01% | 13.28% | +69.73% |
AMDW vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMDW vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison
AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.07%, more than FTQI's 11.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 37.07% | 34.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 11.18% | 11.46% | 11.66% | 11.49% | 9.85% | 3.05% | 3.27% | 2.95% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.02% | 3.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMDW and FTQI have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.
AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 37.07%, compared with 11.18% for FTQI.
AMDW is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMDW and 0.75% for FTQI.
Find the right allocation for AMDW and FTQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer